Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marajade
The author stated that she didn't have any personal knowledge of any illegal immigrant... If my understanding of the law is correct, she is in compliance with the law.

The article says that this Bishop clown is aiding and abetting illegals, and that Nappy supports what he's doing. I did not accuse that lousy 'Rat of a crime, but you must have overlooked this part of the article: "Governor Napolitano says she fully supports the program, even if it supports illegal immigrants" . Nappy should be recalled based on that statement alone.

Furthermore, the author states that what the good Bishop is doing is not illegal, and that is clearly incorrect. It is illegal, and he and Rios ought to be locked up for their despicable activities.

45 posted on 05/11/2003 3:22:53 PM PDT by Tancredo Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Tancredo Fan
Supporting something is different than being complicit in it...

Why is the Catholic Church allowed to commit illegalities?
48 posted on 05/11/2003 3:29:08 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Tancredo Fan
What would you have the Bishop do? Have a hungry man produce two forms of identification before he can get a loaf of bread? What he is doing appears to me more like unbiased compassion, not any concerted effort to break the law. And if there's a law that says a Bishop can't give a hungry man bread, then I hope he breaks it. The authorities clearly know where he is, and if they want to lock him up, then I suspect he'll go with them. But when a government tells the Church that it can't practice compassion, I call that tyranny.
49 posted on 05/11/2003 3:33:36 PM PDT by JaimeD2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson