Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When the Right was Right
The Washington Dispatch ^ | 5/11/03 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 05/11/2003 10:33:18 AM PDT by DPB101

Why do they keep digging up the corpse of Joe McCarthy for a ritual flogging? The Wisconsin senator died in 1957. He never killed anyone. He never sent anyone to prison.

Harry Truman dropped atomic bombs on two defenseless cities of a prostrate nation and sent 2 million Russian prisoners back to Stalin to be murdered in Operation Keelhaul. Yet Truman remains a hero to those who despise McCarthy with an undying hatred.

Why? Even if what is alleged is true -- that McCarthy bullied witnesses and accused men of disloyalty who only made mistakes -- that still does not explain why the Left cannot let go of him.

The answer: As no other man, Tailgunner Joe stripped the old establishment of its reputation, credibility and moral authority in the eyes of the people. McCarthy convinced Middle America that FDR and Truman had been duped by "Uncle Joe," had tolerated treason, and had blundered and lost in five years all the fruits of the victory won by the blood and sacrifice of the Greatest Generation in World War II.

The establishment has never recovered from that beating.

In the latest document dump by the Senate, we learn -- horror of horror! -- that McCarthy questioned witnesses in private before selecting those he put on the stand. But so, too, did the Watergate committee of the sainted Sam Ervin. This is a common practice of senators who don't want to be surprised before TV cameras.

The New York Times' Sheryl Gay Stolberg writes that those few historians shown the latest documents claim they "do not support McCarthy's theories that, in the 1950s, communist spies were operating in the highest levels of government."

Perhaps not, Ms. Stohlberg. But if so, that is only because, by the 1950s, the spies had been rooted out, though their collaborators remained. But they had been there, selling out their country.

Indeed, the espionage and treason, proven again by the Venona transcripts -- the intercepted coded messages from Soviet agents to Moscow -- were far more extensive than even McCarthy imagined. In the 1940s, the U.S. Government was honeycombed with traitors and spies. Even today, not all the names have been revealed. Call the roll:

-- Alger Hiss and Lawrence Duggan, two of the highest ranking diplomats at State, were communist traitors and spies. Hiss stood behind FDR at Yalta when Eastern Europe was signed away to Stalin and helped shape the United Nations for Harry Truman.

-- Harry Dexter White, father of the International Monetary Fund and the "Morgenthau Plan" to smash all German industry after the war -- a plan embraced, then disowned, by FDR -- was a Soviet agent. Truman knew it by 1946 and covered it up.

-- Lauchlin Currie was a Soviet spy on the White House staff.

-- William Remington was the Soviet spy at Commerce.

-- Judith Coplon headed up a spy ring at Justice with access to the FBI secrets and files she transferred to Soviet agents.

-- The Rosenbergs were communist traitors who gave their Russian handlers secrets of the atom bomb. The brother of Robert Oppenheimer, father of the A-bomb, was a communist, as was his wife, who was a lifelong friend of Steve Nelson, a key figure in the Communist Party underground apparatus.

On and on the list goes. For an unbiased account of McCarthy's life, Arthur Herman's "Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator" is indispensable.

McCarthy's career as an anti-Communist began in February 1950 with his Wheeling speech and was effectively ended with his censure in December 1954. Why was Harry Truman chased out of Washington in 1952 with an approval rating of 23 percent? Why did Joe McCarthy enjoy a 50-29 favorable rating as late as January 1954?

Because McCarthy, almost alone, was exposing the treason and folly of those who had ceded half of Europe to Stalin and all of China to the murderous hordes of Mao Tse-tung. And with 200 American boys dying every week in Truman's "no-win war" in Korea, Americans were demanding explanations.

The 1950s were good years. No one was terrified then, except the fools who had joined a Communist Party that turned out to be a lickspittle of the Comintern. Gallup polls of the era show not even 1 percent of Americans were concerned about "witch-hunting" or "anti-Communist hysteria" or "McCarthyism." That is pure myth.

In 1954, when some snot at the 15th reunion of his class got up to toast Harvard College for never having produced an Alger Hiss or a Joe McCarthy, John F. Kennedy stood up and walked out, roaring, "How dare you couple the name of a great American patriot with that of a traitor." Yes, indeed, that was when the Right was right.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: conservatism; mccarthy; patbuchanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Balto_Boy
Hi also doesn't tell us what alternative to the bomb was available that would not have endangered American live and would have resulted in fewer Japanese deaths.

How could America not sin when under attack and without mediation indeed. IT WAS ALL OF JAPAN'S FAULT.

21 posted on 05/11/2003 12:03:56 PM PDT by JudgemAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Harry Truman dropped atomic bombs on two defenseless cities of a prostrate nation ...

That's not the way I heard it. And I heard it from the people who were involved with fighting Japan back then; the ones that survived.

I used to sorta like Pat. Statements like this make me reconsider.

22 posted on 05/11/2003 12:06:21 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Harry Truman dropped atomic bombs on two defenseless cities of a prostrate nation

LOL, I didn't notice who the author was, but when I read this line - I knew. Only Pat would describe our enemy in WW2 as prostrate and defenseless. I wonder how many of our WW2 Marine Vets think that they fought a "prostrate nation."

23 posted on 05/11/2003 12:10:00 PM PDT by Sci Fi Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: det dweller too
I remember watching the News Flicks at the movies showning Joe, he didn't come across very well on the screen and the tube, like Nixon during the debates against Sainted John.

My Father would discourse for hours about the reds in DC naming names, history has proven my Old Man right, Venona and other publications, Joe was on the money, but he like Trickey Dick didn't come across well.

24 posted on 05/11/2003 12:23:50 PM PDT by Little Bill (No Rats, A.N.S.W.E.R (WWP) is a commie front!!!!,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
I live in the Appleton (WI) area. McCarthy's grave is regularly visited by people who bring flowers. Once in a while some moron tries to vandalize the site. Then the local paper gets its panties in a twist over the late Senator's life and political actions.

Not once does the paper condemn the vandals, and only mentioned in a single sentence the flowers on the grave.

No, the vandalism was an excuse for the local rag to excoriate McCarthy yet again.
25 posted on 05/11/2003 1:56:52 PM PDT by petuniasevan (Wonders of the Universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: det dweller too
It's a well known fact, even from people like William F. Buckley, that Joe was a severe alcoholic. I believe that's what he died from, liver cancer. Also, he went after people like George Marshall, an accusation that Eisenhower never forgave him for. Of course he has been demonized, but he was far from being a saint.
26 posted on 05/11/2003 2:23:06 PM PDT by Mr.Clark (From the darkness....I shall come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Alger Hiss was a member of the elite, btw ... Johns Hopkins University, 1926.

Joe McCarthy was a better man than he.
27 posted on 05/11/2003 2:42:24 PM PDT by WOSG (Free Iraq! Free Cuba, North Korea, Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Tibet, China...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
Careful .. the left would have had far greater victories had Joe McCarthy not exposed the leftist fellow-travellers.

Liberals simply (re)write history to suit their propoganda.


"But, now that we have free media in this country, it will no longer work and that is why the neocommunists and paleoleftists love to dig up Joe. "

Now that they no longer control the media, we can re-ask the questions: What did McCarthy do right? What did he do wrong? Were there spies in the US administration? The answer would make the leftist twits quite uncomfortable.
28 posted on 05/11/2003 2:46:14 PM PDT by WOSG (Free Iraq! Free Cuba, North Korea, Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Tibet, China...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Balto_Boy
Hi also doesn't tell us what alternative to the bomb was available that would not have endangered American live and would have resulted in fewer Japanese deaths.

A demonstration in Tokyo Bay might have encouraged surrender. But one never knows. Buchanan does weaken his argument by refering to Hiroshima and Nagasaka. Suffice to say, Operation Keelhaul was a horror of twenty times the magnitude, and no one ever debates the poor judgement of Truman in allowing that.

29 posted on 05/11/2003 2:50:59 PM PDT by JoeSchem (Okay, now it works: Knight's Quest, at http://geocities.com/engineerzero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

The surrender was too sketchy as it was; it required sneaky maneuvering my the Emperor (who had never exercised much power but theoretically could, unless the military had him killed). We know now that there was some risk that the Emperor would be deposed for favoring surrender; most of the elites wanted to let "100 Million Die Together!" as this was the only way they stood a chance at completely preserving their privileged positions.

The Japanese population itself was not broken. There are many stories of the populations of already bombed-out cities, WEEPING and beating their chests, saying "NO, please no!" when the Emperor's surrender announcement was played on the radio. They wanted to keep fighting for their God-Emperor and die as martyers. They were bloodied as hell but no wear near prostrate.

Pat B. has now gone on record celebrating or defending BOTH of the main axis powers (let's not forget about the "courage" of Hitler!). He is clearly at worst anti-American, favoring the interests of other nations over his own, or at best stupid enough to think there would've been no harm in letting the Germans rule Europe and the Japanese rule the Pacific Rim.

Pat Buchanan is to the left what Sharpton is to the right; a moronic blowhard siphoning off the votes of the most ignorant 2% of one end of the political spectrum. I would have to guess most of his funding has actually come Democrats convinced that we are funding Sharpton!

30 posted on 05/11/2003 3:48:05 PM PDT by American Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Kennedy was the only Senator who did not censure McCarthy. He had a back injury at the time. This was in Chris Matthew's Kennedy and Nixon: The Rivalry That Shaped Post-War America.
31 posted on 05/11/2003 4:11:35 PM PDT by profmike23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan; TonyRo76; profmike23
Robert Kennedy was one of Joe McCarthy's top aides. He picked Joseph McCarthy- not any of his brothers- to be the godfather of his first child, Kathleed Kennedy Townsend, former Lt. Governor of Maryland.
32 posted on 05/11/2003 5:36:31 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: profmike23
Kennedy was the only Senator who did not censure McCarthy. He had a back injury at the time.

Interesting.

33 posted on 05/11/2003 5:40:17 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Robert Kennedy was one of Joe McCarthy's top aides. He picked Joseph McCarthy- not any of his brothers- to be the godfather of his first child, Kathleed Kennedy Townsend, former Lt. Governor of Maryland.

Wow, another jewel of information. I wonder if that came out during her campaign. :^)

34 posted on 05/11/2003 5:41:42 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
BTTT
35 posted on 05/11/2003 5:53:20 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: petuniasevan; dix; Reactionary; MEG33; Texas_Jarhead; weegee; Skywalk; ghostrider; ...
I live in the Appleton (WI) area. McCarthy's grave is regularly visited by people who bring flowers. Once in a while some moron tries to vandalize the site. Then the local paper gets its panties in a twist over the late Senator's life and political actions.

Depressing. Local papers once had positions of their own. Now they reflect in a timid, derivative way, the party line of the New York Times and DNC.

"There he came, from the heartland of America, a tenacious and quite ordinary politician; and in a sudden and lasting moment of recognition, he saw the central truth of his age: that his country, his faith, his civilization was at war with communism, war pure and simple. 'This war will not end except in either victory or death for this civilization' he said again and again. And so this fallen warrior, though dead, speaketh, calling a nation of free men to be delivered from the complacency of a false security and from regarding those who loudly sound the trumpets of vigilance and alarm as mere disturbers of the peace."
- Senate Chaplain Rev. Frederick Brown Harris at Senator Joe McCarthy's memorial.

37 posted on 05/11/2003 8:17:48 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
McCarthy was on to them and they had to discredit him. So they did and they will resurrect him any time they feel endangered. That is when you look for the real story.
38 posted on 05/11/2003 8:21:00 PM PDT by KingofQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Statesmanship is not about making noises and attracting attention. It has to do with having a long term effect on the nation's history. McCarthy concentrated on exploiting real issues for short-term political gain, stinting accuracy and carefulness to get headlines. That's why he has such a bad reputation.
39 posted on 05/11/2003 8:27:02 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x
McCarthy didn't get much wrong. And if you want to look for baseless charges, American citizens unjustly accused, look at the Soviet spy who introduced the bill creating the House Committee on UnAmerican Activities. After several years of going after America citizens suspected of Nazi sympathies (they weren't Reds in other words), Dickstein became enraged when the committee turned its focus to communists in government. On February 11, 1941, Dickstein said on the floor of the House of Representatives:
One hundred and ten fascist organizations in the United States have had, and have now the key to the back door of the Un-American Activities Committee!

Democrats can dish out false charges about everyone else but don't let McCarthy or anyone else tell the truth about them.

And lets not forget the Church and Iran Contra Hearings in which Democrats went after patriotic Americans and protected their friends in the Soviet Union. American CIA agents were murdered because of Democrat Party witchhunts.

40 posted on 05/11/2003 9:00:35 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson