Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cultural Jihad
"...why you want to have the innocence of children assaulted?"

Chidren are protected by consent laws, and their parents are responsible for protecting them. We are discussing the rights of consensual adults here.

The "for the children" argument is usually a tool of the left CJ.

283 posted on 05/12/2003 1:58:31 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Most goldminers used to blame stuff on the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez; ArGee; Kevin Curry

The fact that Democrats (who passed all the so-called 'consenting adults' legislation you and the other moral-liberals are approving of) shill for children is no excuse for ignoring the rights of children and for shirking society's huge responsibility in their well-being, when setting public policy.

In a free republic, the well-being of children is everyone's responsibility. Otherwise, do you smirk and wash your hands and turn away when you see a child being slapped, abused, or neglected in Little Havana, claiming it's all the responsibility of the parents?

304 posted on 05/12/2003 4:28:20 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez; ArGee; Kevin Curry

In other words, children have no right to their own innocence, but adults have a right to pollute the culture with their perversions. If children are walking outside and are exposed to it, then it's all the fault of the parents, apparently. Your moral-liberal argument tries to excuse and laud the adult-centric sewer of the Democratic/Socialist/Communist/Greens/Libertarian Party.

305 posted on 05/12/2003 4:35:01 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson