Such a gestapo mindset you exhibit, Luis. I hope it's a passing fad of yours, since you are usually a level-headed individual in many other areas of thought. Anything is morally-licit within a heterosexual marriage provided it is consensual and in no way degrading to either partner.
"Anything is morally-licit within a heterosexual marriage, provided it is consensual and in no way degrading to either partner."
Not at all CJ, and that's my point. How can a partner be degraded if they consent to it? Do you then support swinging?
The anal cavity is as dirty in married women as it is in unmarried men. The Bible does not draw a distinction between heterosexual sodomy and homosexual sodomy, married or unmarried, and neither did the men who authored the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson said that sodomites "should be punished, if a man, by castration, if a woman by cutting through the cartilage of her nose of one-half inch in diameter at least." Do you see a distinction between married sodomites and ummarried sodomites there?
We have tempered with all the very same concepts that we stand on to condemn homosexuals, in order to justify our own participation in the very same activity we describe as deviant.