To: Just mythoughts
The security of a free State does not includer your right to blow away a burglar, does it? Or to blow away the old man if he's coming at you with a knife?
The problem with you, is that you want to interpret the constitution when you need to support your arguments, then turn around and demand literal interpretation of others when you want your fallacies debunked.
You want specific constitutional verbiage detailing a right to privacy, but want to freely interpret the second to support your viewpoint.
Loser.
214 posted on
05/12/2003 7:04:31 AM PDT by
Luis Gonzalez
(Most goldminers used to blame stuff on the ass.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
LAUGH OUT LOUD, CRY BABY!
My constitution demands that I not only not blow away a burglar, but that I invite him in. HA HA HA NOT
Also demands I sharpen that knife first before I stand still and let an old man stick a knife. HA HA HA NOT
Interpret, FALLACIES - good word old boy.
Common sense, if we the people are the government and the second give a right to bear arms for the security of a "Free" State then who the >ell is one to defend.
"LOSER", You think I really care if you call me names.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson