[Sam Cree]

I believe that unmarried male homosexuals are far more promiscuous than umarried hetero couples, thus the danger of spreading disease is greater among homosexual couples.

[Kevin Curry]

I believe that . . . male homosexuals are far more promiscuous than unmarried hetero couples, thus the danger of spreading disease is greater among homosexual couples.

A truth that it is not politically correct to point out.

[supercat]

I believe that unmarried male homosexuals are far more promiscuous than umarried hetero couples, thus the danger of spreading disease is greater among homosexual couples.

While that may well be true, that does not imply that every homosexual couple is more promiscuous than every heterosexual couple.

I guess what bothers me most about statutes like the one in Texas, though, is that there has (AFAIK) been no significant effort to enforce the statute against people committing sodomy in property they control (either through ownership or rental) and were only detected because police happened to enter their property without a warrant for stated reasons which had nothing to do with these people's conduct.

[MarkL]

I believe that unmarried male homosexuals are far more promiscuous than umarried hetero couples, thus the danger of spreading disease is greater among homosexual couples.

Interesting that you didn't compare unmarried (single) male homosexuals to unmarried (single) male heterosexual males. Instead you compared them to couples. I would be willing to bet that unmarried homosexual couples are no more promiscuous than unmarried heterosexual couples. I know how promiscuous unmarried heterosexuals can be... I went to college, and saw it first hand!

Mark

[GSWarrior]

I believe that unmarried male homosexuals are far more promiscuous than umarried hetero couples, thus the danger of spreading disease is greater among homosexual couples.

Let's start arresting people on the basis of what they might do.