Skip to comments.
Anti-sodomy laws violate
individual liberties
The NH Sunday News ^
| 5/11/03
| Deroy Murdock
Posted on 05/11/2003 7:04:33 AM PDT by RJCogburn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 461-472 next last
To: Cultural Jihad
I'm responsible for my kids, you are not, the government is not, and complete strangers are not.
I am NOT reponsible for the neglect of others, the government is not responsible for the neglect of others (they punish neglect), YOU are not responsible for the neglect of others.
One of the most basic of all conservative ideals is that of a small, non-intrusive government.
You may wish to examine your own ideology, it's much closer to that of a Liberal's in this issue than most here.
341
posted on
05/12/2003 9:20:50 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Most goldminers used to blame stuff on the ass.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
...and you are so blinded by your hatred that you can't see that!
Hatred is to tell people to go to hell in a handbasket, for all you care.
To: Cultural Jihad
"Somehow we must allow bestiality..."What part of "consenting adults" is it that you don't seem to understand?
Unless you can convince me that you are Dr. Doolittle, you will not convince me that the sheep you are sleeping with consented to your advances.
343
posted on
05/12/2003 9:23:17 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Most goldminers used to blame stuff on the ass.)
To: Cultural Jihad
Hatred is what you've been displaying here for quite sometime.
Verbiage like yours is what homosexuals use to illustrate their need for special protection under the law.
Way to go CJ.
344
posted on
05/12/2003 9:24:54 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Most goldminers used to blame stuff on the ass.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
I am NOT reponsible for the neglect of others, the government is not responsible for the neglect of others (they punish neglect), YOU are not responsible for the neglect of others.
Not directly, but you and I have a moral responsibility to mitigate the damages, rather than just shrugging.
One of the most basic of all conservative ideals is that of a small, non-intrusive government.
So pined Al Capone, but we don't call him a conservative on that account. Supposedly the Founding Fathers who oversaw the institution of our self-governance, which included laws against homosexual sodomy, were not conservatives according to the moral-liberal Luis Gonzalez. It is the allowance of perversion which bloats the government, Luis, not the proscription against irresponsibility.
To: Cultural Jihad
What's worse a gay tee totaler, or a heterosexual doper... just curious?
To: dogbyte12
"Gay"? What's that? It is an Orwellian word used to describe unhappy people who suffer from an immoral desire.
To: Cultural Jihad
is an Orwellian word used to describe unhappy people who suffer from an immoral desire. You don't sound too happy yourself there buddy. Any immoral desires to go with your anger?
To: Cultural Jihad
Hatred is to tell people to go to hell in a handbasket, for all you care.And Love requires that we throw the poor sinners in jail.
To: Just mythoughts
You seem to be missing the point I was attempting to make. Poster #8 claimed that his/her favored holy writ said that Lot did not offer his daughters. I pointed out that the poster was incorrect; the scripture said precisely that. That was my point, in its entirety.
And no, I don't care to suppose what any particular supernatural entity brought by your Heavenly Father would or would not have permitted. Supernatural beings tend to be rather capricious, so who knows.
350
posted on
05/12/2003 9:37:06 PM PDT
by
jde1953
To: buffyt
Interesting that God was all over performing miracles or "smiting" sinners. Why no direct action anymore in the age of science and reason?
351
posted on
05/12/2003 9:38:21 PM PDT
by
Skywalk
To: Trailerpark Badass
And Love requires that we throw the poor sinners in jail.Common sense allows the state to discourage disease-spreading, early death-inducing behaviors such as sodomy--by jail if necessary.
Of course, you may lack common sense and not understand this.
To: Cultural Jihad
"Supposedly the Founding Fathers who oversaw the institution of our self-governance, which included laws against homosexual sodomy..."Where are these laws in the Constitution?
These Founders also owned slaves, and Ben Franklin was quite the fornicator and adulterer.
353
posted on
05/12/2003 9:42:25 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Most goldminers used to blame stuff on the ass.)
To: Skywalk
The scripture says they bring the due penalty on themselves. That tends to occur naturally when you stick a male organ in a faeces-filled anus. Some of the more unpleasant scourges that result: AIDS, gonnorhea, hepatitis B etc.
Some of these diseases are so hideous that the sufferers might wish they were at ground zero in Sodom instead.
But keep defending it.
Comment #355 Removed by Moderator
To: Luis Gonzalez
Where are these laws in the Constitution?
When I said 'laws' I didn't say 'Constitution.' Speaking of which, where is homosexual sodomy a protected right in the Constitution? Or bestiality? Or prostitution? Or necrophilia? Or usury? Or drug abuse? These are all supposedly consensual behaviors, too, which the Democratic-Socialist-Libertarians extol.
To: Kevin Curry
Luis Gonzales wrote to Cultural Jihad:
"Supposedly the Founding Fathers who oversaw the institution of our self-governance, which included laws against homosexual sodomy..." To which he replied:
Where are these laws in the Constitution?
These Founders also owned slaves, and Ben Franklin was quite the fornicator and adulterer.
You replied:
Was Ben Frankin a sodomizer like yourself?
Mr. Curry, this just a bit out of bounds, don't you think? Franklin's eccentricities are well known. Do you have to be so rude to Luis?
357
posted on
05/12/2003 9:49:13 PM PDT
by
Liberal Classic
(Quemadmoeum gladis nemeinum occidit, occidentis telum est.)
To: Cultural Jihad
Please explain how beastiality and necrophilia are consentual behaviors. I suppose you engage in contracts with animals and they put a paw print on the document.
358
posted on
05/12/2003 9:50:38 PM PDT
by
breakem
To: MarkL
Offering your daughters to be raped, abandoning your own blood for "hospitality's sake" is a FAR FAR worse sin.
Just put yourself in that situation, assuming that death will not be the fate of one party.
359
posted on
05/12/2003 9:51:22 PM PDT
by
Skywalk
To: breakem
You have a problem with others using their own livestock property as they see fit?! And who claims that a person can't consent to donate their body to the all-important orgy-pit?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 461-472 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson