To: reformedliberal
You'll notice that they never address anything Strauss has written. Everything centers around what other people think or have said about Strauss; everything focuses on motives. The implication seems to be that motives account for everything.
Strauss wouldn't have agreed with this approach. He actually believed in truth.
To: Reactionary
Strauss is a very complex thinker. I doubt most people could sit down, page through a book and "get it." Impossible.
Stanley Rosen Bump!
13 posted on
05/11/2003 7:59:47 AM PDT by
diotima
(FR/FRN SUPPORTS OUR TROOPS!!!!!!!!)
To: Reactionary
Motives do seem to count for everything for the left! Horowitz called them the ideology of good intentions.I don't know much but I know which road is paved with good intentions.(I thank you for sharing your understanding)
14 posted on
05/11/2003 8:02:45 AM PDT by
MEG33
To: Reactionary
You'll notice that they never address anything Strauss has written. Everything centers around what other people think or have said about Strauss; everything focuses on motives. The implication seems to be that motives account for everything. Yes, I noticed. Nothing like the elite code of a journalist.
26 posted on
05/11/2003 9:04:32 AM PDT by
cornelis
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson