Posted on 05/10/2003 2:49:52 AM PDT by Mia T
|
hyperlinked images of shame |
|
by Mia T, 4.6.03
Mia T, THE ALIENS
Al From is sounding the alarm. "Unless we convince Americans that Democrats are strong on national security," he warns his party, "Democrats will continue to lose elections."
Helloooo? That the Democrats have to be spoon-fed what should be axiomatic post-9/11 is, in and of itself, incontrovertible proof that From's advice is insufficient to solve their problem.
From's failure to fully lay out the nature of the Democrats' problem is not surprising: he is the guy who helped seal his party's fate. It was his Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) that institutionalized the proximate cause of the problem, clintonism, and legitimized its two eponymic provincial operators on the national stage. The "Third Way" and "triangulation" don't come from the same Latin root for no reason.
That "convince" is From's operative word underscores the Democrats' dilemma. Nine-eleven was transformative. It is no longer sufficient merely to convince. One must demonstrate, demonstrate convincingly, if you will
which means both in real time and historically.
When it comes to national security, Americans will no longer take any chances. Turning the turn of phrase back on itself, the era of the Placebo President is over. (Incidentally, the oft-quote out-of-context sentence fragment alluded to here transformed meaningless clinton triangulation into a meaningful if deceptive soundbite.)
Although From is loath to admit it -- the terror in his eyes belies his facile solution -- the Democratic party's problem transcends its anti-war contingent.
With a philosophy that relinquishes our national sovereignty -- and relinquishes it reflexively
and to the UN no less -- the Democratic party is, by definition, the party of national insecurity.
With policy ruled by pathologic self-interest -- witness the "Lieberman Paradigm," Kerry's "regime change" bon mot (gone bad), Edwards' and the clintons' brazen echoes thereof (or, alternatively, Pelosi's less strident wartime non-putdown putdown)
and, of course, the clincher -- eight years of the clintons' infantilism, grotesquerie and utter failure -- the Democratic party is, historically and in real time, the party of national insecurity.
The Democrats used to be able to wallpaper their national insecurity with dollars and demogoguery. But that was before 9/11. |
The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime
"Free Republic is one of those groups obsessed with the Clinton era." Word's out: Protest at Hillary's tonight
|
WRITTEN IN STONE 2: the clintons define the clintons
Norwegian Braves clinton's Implicit Threat ("If you give my Nobel to Bush, you'll go to hell.")
The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime
hillary clinton A SECURITY RISK: Removal Calls Begin
THE UNSTATED MESSAGE OF THE POWELL EVIDENCE
Another mistaken 'conceptzia'
WHY AMERICA (& THE WORLD) CANNOT SURVIVE ANOTHER CLINTON
(INDEED, IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT WE ARE GOING TO SURVIVE THE FIRST ONE,)
WAS AL QAEDA THE TARGET OF A TAKEOVER BY IRAQ?
Utter-Failure clintons Concoct Left-Wing-Radio Scheme FIG LEAF
Flower Children Fall for the 2 Self-Evident Thugs & Opportunists Yet Again
(Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation)
THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER: Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992
COMING APART: What clinton was REALLY saying... and why... when he bashed Bush in Canada
the logic of pathologic self-interest
The only thing that can stop American power now
Yet More RapeLies: CNNs of Commission, Rapist Demagogues and 9/11
THE "DEBATE"
Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent
Mrs. clinton's REAL virtual office update
You think Im kidding?
They really did tear that down.
Click here.
Excerpt:
Who is to blame when a historic landmark is lost? Part of the blame belongs to a throw-away society that places little premium on historical structures. Some of the blame must accrue to preservationists and historians who failed to recognize the significance of this structure hidden within May Supply Company. Most of the blame, however, must go to the Clinton Library Foundation and the City of Little Rock, neither of whom showed any evidence of a good faith effort to evaluate various options for keeping the station or moving a smaller representative section to a nearby site. One must also wonder why Clinton library site engineers failed to call attention to this historical building during the early stages of the library design. Site engineers had conducted exhaustive surveys of the area, surveys which had given them access to this building while it was cocooned within other structures and effectively hidden from the public. Were the survey engineers incapable of recognizing an unquestionably historic structure, or was their silence a deliberate calculated effort to conceal details of a landmark which they considered expendible?
hehe ! Here ya go !
You read my mind. ;)
It's up to us to "unspike" Estrich.
My suggestion:
Post the thing everywhere. Post it in venues that archive.
I will do my part and create all manner of bloggery on the original piece as well as on the spiking.
The Ds didn't have to be told this, BTW. They know. Doubtless, talks of coup dominate D circles... and squares. clinton antipathy does extend leftward.
COMING APART: What clinton was REALLY saying... and why... when he bashed Bush in Canada
the logic of pathologic self-interest
The only thing that can stop American power now
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.