[Kozak]

Well the problem you see is, when an Islamonazi blows up a group of diners at a pizzaria, or flies a plane into a building full of civilians, thats not defined as terrorism by many muslims. It falls under their religious definition of defence of Islam if they feel that the Dar al Saalam is under attack ( the house of the believers ).

" It depends on what your definition of the word is, is."
W.J.B. Clinton

[fporretto]

Exactly! This is Clintonian in its brass.

Any time an Islamic spokesman wants to deny the firm correlation between Islam and terrorism, he simply redefines acts of terrorism that involve Muslims as "armed resistance to oppression." Of course, it's incumbent on us not to let them get away with that silently. We have to compel them to do it in public, out in front of God and everybody.

There will come a reckoning. May it come soon!

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason:
http://palaceofreason.com