Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taylor County's uneasy tale of 2 proms (Boortz/O'Reilly/White Prom)
Atlanta-Journal Constitution ^ | may 9, 2003 | CAMERON McWHIRTER

Posted on 05/09/2003 3:39:31 PM PDT by citizen

Taylor County's uneasy tale of 2 proms

By CAMERON McWHIRTER
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

BUTLER -- In this corner of peach country, the biggest thing happening in early May usually is the Strawberry Festival in Reynolds, the next town over.

But for the second May in a row, this county seat of 1,900 residents has drawn international media attention and sparked arguments that reached the Georgia governor's office for, of all things, its high school prom.

Make that proms: one all-white, the other integrated.

Last year, for the first time since Taylor County High School integrated three decades ago, the organizers of separate black and white proms decided to merge their off-campus parties into one prom. Reporters from around the world descended on Butler to write about how a new generation of Southerners was breaking down racial barriers.

But this year's prom organizers -- at least some of them -- chose to step back to an all-white prom. Last Friday, a private whites-only prom was held at the Estate, a banquet hall in Columbus, 50 miles to the west. Tonight, an all-races prom will be held at Fort Valley State University. Both self-declared proms are privately funded.

Last year, folks here embraced all the attention. This year, they don't.

"We're getting beat up unfairly, our students are," said Wayne Smith, superintendent of Taylor County Public Schools, moments after an ABC national news crew left his office this week. "We are being shown to the world as a bunch of racists, which is absolutely not true."

Smith said he had been receiving about 200 phone calls and e-mails a day since news spread of last week's whites-only prom.

Valori Moore, editor and publisher of the weekly The Taylor County News and The Butler Herald, wrote in her column this week that she had received angry calls from as far away as New Jersey.

"It's a situation which makes us all look really bad!" she wrote.

If Superintendent Smith gets his way at a school board meeting Monday, the high school will step in next year and host a single prom that will be teacher-chaperoned and liquor-free. Smith said he could not stop individual students from having their own parties afterward, but he had to respond to counter all the negative publicity about the school system.

"There is nothing we can do to preclude private parties," the superintendent said. "Kids are going to do what they are going to do. All we can do is offer an alternative. . . . I had to do something."

Brian Lawson, a 23-year-old air conditioning repairman, attended last week's party with his 18-year-old girlfriend, Erin Posey, a senior at Taylor County High. They plan to attend the second prom tonight as well.

Lawson said having two proms struck him as foolish, and it had split friendships. He said that while he and his girlfriend attended the whites-only party, he didn't consider it the real prom. He did not wear a tuxedo, he said, as he will tonight.

"I want to go hang out and have fun with friends," said Lawson, wearing a T-shirt displaying a photograph of black actor Wesley Snipes. "I don't think the color of your skin decides how much fun you can have at a party. It's not the 1960s; it's 2003. It's time to change."

On the surface, heated discussion about the staging of a dance, or dances, for 88 graduating high school seniors in a remote country town seems the unlikely subject for discussion beyond the confines of the one-story brick high school itself.

But people elsewhere are talking: from pickup trucks outside Allen's supermarket off the courthouse square to British Broadcasting Corp. newscasters in London. The subject even led to nasty verbal jousting between TV commentator Bill O'Reilly, who condemned the separate parties, and radio talker Neal Boortz, who argued the issue was being overblown. O'Reilly has spent days bashing Gov. Sonny Perdue for not condemning the privately sponsored parties.

Perdue spokeswoman Kim King appeared on O'Reilly's television program on the Fox News Network on Tuesday to defend the governor and said Perdue was "disappointed" by the whites-only prom.

The clamor underscores how sensitive, complex and fluid the concept of racial integration can be, especially in the rural South, once the bastion of American segregation.

Towns and cities across the South and across the United States -- no matter what their size -- have wrestled for decades with integration. In many places, not just Taylor County, legal integration of public institutions did not transfer to private institutions and events, like churches, clubs and parties.

In this county of about 8,800, which integrated its schools relatively peacefully in 1970, events such as proms became privately sponsored, and segregated.

Taylor County is 55 percent white and 42 percent black, according to the 2000 census. The graduating high school class is about evenly split racially, according to Smith.

The superintendent said the school board's decision to stop sponsoring proms at the same time school integration took place had nothing to do with race, but was the result of concerns about insurance liability issues. Smith said students throw parties in the nearby cities of Columbus or Macon -- and often drink illegally and drive back home.

Smith and other school officials decry "misguided" media reports of a supposed resurgence of segregation in their community and claim race relations in Taylor County have never been better.

Lonnie Wilson, 70, a black retiree from the Georgia Department of Transportation who has lived his entire life in Butler, said the idea of a whites-only prom was "rotten."

"Why not just have one party for everybody?" he asked.

But Kenneth Dugger, 32, also black and a lifelong Butler resident, said students should be allowed to decide whether to integrate their proms or not.

"If they want to hold their party by themselves, it's their business," he said. "It should be up to the kids. It's their prom."


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: biasednews; boortz; oreilly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
As of last night O'Reilly was still lying by saying it's a school prom, the night before he even said it was on school grounds.

Hey O'Reilly! When you're in over your head, stop digging.

1 posted on 05/09/2003 3:39:31 PM PDT by citizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: citizen
Whatta buncha racist losers...
2 posted on 05/09/2003 3:43:40 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizen
I'm not concerned with these hayseeds. The genetic pool does not take kindly to inbreeding.
3 posted on 05/09/2003 3:47:57 PM PDT by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizen
' Reilly
4 posted on 05/09/2003 3:48:30 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
I notice that 'Stone Mountain' still flies the flag of the California Republic though I pulled it down when I left politically correct Kalifornistan to work in nuclear power. SM, if you don't like Georgia then I'm sure Kalifornistan will welcome you back with an open...
5 posted on 05/09/2003 3:49:39 PM PDT by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: citizen
But Kenneth Dugger, 32, also black and a lifelong Butler resident, said students should be allowed to decide whether to integrate their proms or not.

I agree with this guy ---just keep the government out of social events and keep it from trying to tell people who they have to invite to a party. It'd be better to focus on adult racism, here we have all-black and all-hispanic beauty contests ---no whites allowed, there are hispanic chamber of commerces and black chamber of commerces in some places. How can you tell kids they can't segregate but adults can?

6 posted on 05/09/2003 3:49:40 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dhuffman@awod.com
I notice that 'Stone Mountain' still flies the flag of the California Republic though I pulled it down when I left politically correct Kalifornistan to work in nuclear power. SM, if you don't like Georgia then I'm sure Kalifornistan will welcome you back with an open...

What did I say to deserve that? Because I called a bunch of people who insisted on throwing a whites-only prom a bunch of racist losers? If you want to argue that they aren't a bunch of racist losers, go ahead. If you want to personally insult me, you'll have to do better than that...
7 posted on 05/09/2003 3:54:20 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Oh, that's good, "Hubcap" O'Reilly
8 posted on 05/09/2003 4:05:00 PM PDT by citizen (Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
Now, i'm certainly not racist, but 85% of black people i've encountered (and I've encountered a lot having to participate in desegretation school busing programs) are loud, abnoxious, rude, racist people. Now, i'm not labeling all black people that way since I have some that are very good friends...and who agree 100% with the statement I just presented.

Fact is, you don't know that they're "racist loser" because you don't know the situation down there. They might be racist, they might not, but you shouldn't automatically assume that they are.
9 posted on 05/09/2003 4:11:49 PM PDT by Norse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Agreed. I think segregated events are really stupid. That being said, if people want to be stupid, we should let them.
10 posted on 05/09/2003 4:12:04 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: citizen
Are there any white legislatures in the Congressional Black Caucus? I seem to remember a white guy wanting to join and was told he couldn't. Personally, I think racial exclusion and exclusive racial reservation is shortsighted and kinda dull.
11 posted on 05/09/2003 4:18:43 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
racist losers

I really don't think that's the case.

We're talking small town rural America. For most of these kids it's just something to do on a weekend. If most of these b/w kids don't normally scoalize together, it's very reasonable for a private party to be one group.

Blacks also have segregated parties and that's OK. Happens all over America.

One more point: Most of the kids at the "white" party will be at the school prom tonight which will be held at Fort Valley State University, a black college.

12 posted on 05/09/2003 4:19:06 PM PDT by citizen (Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Norse
Now, i'm certainly not racist, but 85% of black people i've encountered (and I've encountered a lot having to participate in desegretation school busing programs) are loud, abnoxious, rude, racist people. Now, i'm not labeling all black people that way since I have some that are very good friends...and who agree 100% with the statement I just presented. Fact is, you don't know that they're "racist loser" because you don't know the situation down there. They might be racist, they might not, but you shouldn't automatically assume that they are.

I didn't say that black people (or 85% of black people) were or weren't racist. I said that those people who would throw a whites-only prom are racists. If you want to explain to me how they aren't racist, go ahead, but my statement had nothing to do with black people. And yes, I am assuming that those people who would throw a whites-only prom are racist, despite that fact that I don't live with them. And I tend to consider most racists losers. If you would like to explain to me how these white people throwing a whites-only prom are not racist, make your argument and I will reply to it. I haven't read anything so far that has made me change my mind. But I'm always wiling to listen.
13 posted on 05/09/2003 4:23:52 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: citizen
Boortz's website has a new address link

http://www.vicioussob.com

Too funny. Boortz is loving all the attention
14 posted on 05/09/2003 4:29:00 PM PDT by Republican Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizen
I really don't think that's the case. We're talking small town rural America. For most of these kids it's just something to do on a weekend. If most of these b/w kids don't normally scoalize together, it's very reasonable for a private party to be one group. Blacks also have segregated parties and that's OK. Happens all over America.

Perhaps I wasn't clear. If a bunch of blacks there were throwing a "blacks only" prom, I would call them a bunch of racist losers as well.

One more point: Most of the kids at the "white" party will be at the school prom tonight which will be held at Fort Valley State University, a black college.

True. The best thing that I could say in their defense is that if they aren't racist, they are incredibly racially insensitive. And yes I understand that they're young, but I sure wouldn't have attended any racially segregated events when I was young.

I will say that when I made my originaly comment saying "whatta buncha racist losers," I was referring to those people who threw the party more than those who attended. People who attended to hang out with their friends to me may fall into the racially insensitive category rather than the racist loser category. But I stand by my original statement that those who would throw a whites-only prom are a bunch of racist losers.

I realize that many people decide to self-segregate, and although I think it's sad, they are welcome to do so. But throwing an event which is advertised as whites-only (or any other race) is pathetic and to me, a clear indication of being a racist loser.
15 posted on 05/09/2003 4:35:01 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
if people want to be stupid, we should let them.

Those kids certainly did that. I notice that on all the news clips that these kids used quite a few obscene gestures to the cameras. Didn't have sound but, I can imagine the language that went along with their actions.

16 posted on 05/09/2003 4:35:18 PM PDT by kcordell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: citizen
Here's the Boortz comments re: the comment that set O Reilly into manic mode:
http://www.boortz.com/may8-03.htm
17 posted on 05/09/2003 4:36:31 PM PDT by kcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Sure kids are going to be kids and do what's normal for them.

It gets to be a problem if exculsion is school or business policy. The regular folks will work it out just fine between themselves.

There are some, however, that wish to largely segragate. On both sides.

18 posted on 05/09/2003 4:41:45 PM PDT by citizen (Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
When is anyone going to point out that the US Senate has NO BLACK MEMBERS. Indeed, the DNC refused to allow Alan Page (a black judge and Democrat) to run for the vacated seat in Minnesota. They chose a white guy (Mondale) instead.

What hypocrisy!

19 posted on 05/09/2003 4:45:31 PM PDT by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Norse
Fact is, you don't know that they're "racist loser" because you don't know the situation down there. They might be racist, they might not, but you shouldn't automatically assume that they are.

What situation could there be that would have a bunch of white people throwing a whites-only prom and not be considered racist?
20 posted on 05/09/2003 4:46:47 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson