Please re-read: "The Administration woke up to the contents of the report and started acting on it only after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ..."
The way I read it, This article is critical of the Bush administration for not acting on the 1996 CIA report until after 9-11. No mention of Clinton.
I saw that, and felt the need to point out what the author so carefully ignored. You're correct that the article implies that a CIA report that hung around unnoticed for 4 Clinton years (years after the wake-up call of WTC's first bombing) should have been jumped on by THIS administration between Jan. 2001 and Sept. 2001.