[Blzbba]

"It is what they don't do as much of against us as liberals would if they were still in power."


Either way, the liberals are getting their paid meal tickets and I (and you) are stuck footin' the bill!

I voted for Bush because I wanted LESS federal gov't, not more. Instead, I get a guy who's already outpaced Clintax in federal spending.

I doubt I'll vote for him in 2004 at this rate.

[freeper12]

>>Either way, the liberals are getting their paid meal tickets and I (and you) are stuck footin' the bill!


Democrats like to spend money like crazy and raise your taxes to pay for it, whereas republicans are different: They like to spend your money like crazy and tell you nobody has to pay for it.

[WoofDog123]

"I doubt I'll vote for him in 2004 at this rate. "

For conservatives, it really is damned if you do, damned if you don't. Voting for third parties probably helped get bush elected (nader), and certainly helped clinton get elected and re-elected (perot). I do not believe a social conservative (i.e. alan keyes, buchanan, any number of others) is electable in the u.s. anymore.

[Mr. Mojo]

I voted for Bush because I wanted LESS federal gov't, not more. I doubt I'll vote for him in 2004 at this rate.

Seminar poster alert. Frankly, I'm surprised you've lasted this long (almost two weeks).

[nopardons]

Since joing FR, late ( very , the 28th , to be exact ) in April of THIS year, perhaps you need to go looking for a different forum to join, or to stay here , read until your eyes pop out of your head and you finally manage to learn something about politics.

If you aren't really just a troll/disruptor, then you really need to learn what politics is and what it is not. Your post pegs you as an all or nothing kinda person, who would rather have NOTHING , than accept a part of what you wish a president to do.

Sooo, you are you going to vote for, in '04...Dean, Gephart,Kerry ? LOL