Replies

GRRRR! No single poster on FR has actually made me mad before... you are the first one.

You DO NOT know a thing about genetic algorithms, artifical intelligence, or artifical life (of which is a "speciality" of artifical intelligence).

"Evolutionary design," says Pennock, "can often solve problems better than we can using our own intelligence."

Absurd! Even leaving out the often does not make the statement much more believable.

Which, and the arguments you made on those 17-transistor circuits, shows you are completely ignorant when it comes to computers and programming. Now, my expertise is not in genetic algorithms, but at an university near mine they have created better-performing robots using the same genetic-algorithm, randomized techniques resulting in an unanticipated end-design.

Is this how Physicist and Right Wing Professor feel when they come up against creationists who try to argue on the topics of physics?

You are the first, and hopefully only, freeper who has gone completely on my "does not know what the heck he is talking about and therefore his arguments will be discarded" list.

You are the first, and hopefully only, freeper who has gone completely on my "does not know what the heck he is talking about and therefore his arguments will be discarded" list.

You claim to be a scientist and to know what you speak of while the person you attack does not. So why must you insult instead of taking apart his argument? Why don't you try again and give facts instead of insults to support your position???? Perhaps it is you who is ignorant and are try to bluff those who disagree with you into silence as most evolutionists here try to do?

You stated nothing about the operation of anything. All you stated was your opinion. The 17 transistor circuit does exactly what and how? All we have is a statement in a magazine that the circuit performs better than a 9 transistor circuit, both diagrammed in the article. The 9 transistor circuit is actually a modification of the patented circuit which consists of 5 transistors and 4 diodes and no resistors. It has a measured performance on display with the patent. There is no such evidence for the 17 transistor kludge. The specifications are for the circuit to be compact and work to the gigahertz range. There is no evidence that the 17 transistor circuit can achieve those specs.

Is this how Physicist and Right Wing Professor feel when they come up against creationists who try to argue on the topics of physics?

What depresses me is when, having debunked the second law argument about evolution for the fifth or sixth time, as clearly as I can, it gets repeated yet again. And it depresses me that the creationists who know better will never correct their own side. When I've posted something that turned out to be wrong or inaccurate, I've been corrected by evolutionists, most of whom seem to have a concern for the truth. Never seen that on the other side.