To: Gee Wally
As I understand the article, simpler functions mutate into more complex functions in the program. Even the earliest simple A-life: Holland's game of Life, could have been described and implemented as a collection of cells with their own programs. Collections of cells in Life can take on a permanent relationship that looks, to the viewer, like a discrete entity with lifelike features. It was not necessary for the programmer to arrange this--it just happened. Find Holland's game of life on the net somewhere and try it out--I think you'll get the picture quickly enough.
848 posted on
05/09/2003 1:32:11 PM PDT by
donh
To: donh
Holland's game of Life, Minor correction: I think it was John Conway who came up with the Game of Life.
To: donh
The "Game of Life" (Conway's) is interesting because some randomly generated configurations can become universal Turing machines. The same for some of Wolfram's cellular automata. A randomly chosen cellular automaton has 1 chance in 256 of being able to simulate a universal Turing machine.
1,009 posted on
05/09/2003 9:45:36 PM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson