Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
Sorry, information overload, you're right, it wasn't explained in this article. My apologies.

I have read elsewhere, that this device had been patented in 2000 and since then there have been a number of others that have been submitted.

Hence the term, Patent Pending.

Sorry, but NOT all of my information comes from this forum, but then again, I should have been more succinct, you can't seem to handle the fact that evolution does INDEED work, and is proven EVERY day.

Yep, must be tough for you guys, but then again, galileo made it awfully tough for the church too, but they finally came around.
759 posted on 05/09/2003 10:32:02 AM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies ]


To: Aric2000
I have read elsewhere, that this device had been patented in 2000 and since then there have been a number of others that have been submitted.

Why would the person who was involved in the process make the referenced statement in 2003? Why would the following be written in the February 2003 Scientific American?

The first patent for an invention created by genetic programming may soon be granted.

796 posted on 05/09/2003 11:53:53 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 759 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson