Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void
As soon as you "prove" a 17 transistor circuit with better performace is significantly worse/bigger/more expensive than a 9 transistor circuit.

Fine, you prove the better performance of the 17 transistor circuit.

726 posted on 05/09/2003 9:04:15 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 722 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
See the patent:

FIG. 7 illustrates a graph 700 showing experimental results using the cubic function generator 600 as a shaper input to a power amplifier as in FIG. 2. For the experiment, the power amplifier produced an output signal related to the input signal substantially by 1/x.sup.3. The test was conducted using the setup of FIG. 2, with the function generator 220 being replaced by the specific cubic function generator 600. The graph 700 charts the input 210 on the horizontal axis 705 and the output 215 on the vertical axis 710. The cubic function generator 600 causes the output 215 of the power amplifier 205 to be approximately linear, as evidenced by output curve 720.

730 posted on 05/09/2003 9:10:53 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 726 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson