I am sorry, but what did you provide me evidence of? Your assertion is that one cannot patent something that one does not understand. Describing what something does isn't the same thing as understanding how it does it.
Your assertion is that one cannot patent something that one does not understand. Reread what I "asserted"
I think someone might have difficulty getting a patent for something that they cannot explain the workings, but you never know
I provided evidence of a pretty concise description of a device and how it worked in a patent.