Replies

Aaah, the liar of evolution has to go back a year to blame me for his own imbecility in claiming that the orbits of the planets were not elliptical. Well bud, that does not even have anything to do with evolution and it was you that was the fool not I.

Further, I have made numerous arguments here about evolution, right here on this thread which no one has refuted and have never been refuted. So your statement that the arguments I have made here had been refuted 'numerous times' is just one more of your lies, your numerous lies. Here are some statements from this very thread that have not been refuted:

1. Post# 1934 about the simulation in this article failing three test for veracity.

2.Post# 1804 "Only intelligent designers can assemble matter in ways which have nothing to do with naturally known forces. "

3. Post# 1685 "you do need a large group to mutate together in a sexual species in order for evolution to work. This makes punk-eek totally impossible and Darwinian evolution ludicrous at best."

4. Post# 1604 "IF EVOLUTION IS SCIENCE, WHY CANNOT THEY PROVE IT FROM REAL LIFE? WHY MUST THEY GO FOR PROOF TO PHONY, CONCOCTED 'SIMULATAIONS'? SCIENCE IS ABOUT REAL LIFE, NOT ABOUT COMPUTER GAMES."

5. Post# 1558 about the impossibility of abiogenesis (life from non-life) - the impossibility of the self-assembly of half a million pieces of DNA, the DNA/RNA symbolism, and the chicken-egg problem of DNA needing an organism and an organism needing DNA.

You will note that a couple of the above refer specifically to the present article ON THIS THREAD so your statement in Post# 1937 that "Two years ago, when your statements were fresh, they were refuted out of hand a half-dozen times or so. " was a complete and deliberate lie, and you knew it when you made it.

Bye liar.