Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: balrog666
Since you are fairly civil in your response I will reply.

I disagree with your premise, spelling errors aside.

You are correct. My premise was hyperbole. I should have written "Gaffes are not rare on these threads and are made on different sides of arguments."

As to your description of certain types of individuals being eager to confess error, I tend to disagree, having been recently involved in a dispute. I will merely state that so as not to invoke a new exchange of words over the incident.

Involved in the topic was another individual, who was mistaken. He civilly asked for an explanation. I gave it to him citing the source and explaining his error. I did not refer to it as an error and I did not call him names for not reading or understanding what was available to him. The individual never acknowledged error, and I did not harry him for such an acknowledgement. I offered to go on and discuss a part of the controversy but received no reply. It seems to me that he did not wish to "technically" discuss the topic when given the opportunity. I also find that to be "overcooked"(not rare) on these threads.

1,924 posted on 05/24/2003 5:14:51 PM PDT by AndrewC (mote and beam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1920 | View Replies ]


To: All
PLACEMARKER Switch to plan F3. Oook! Oook!
1,925 posted on 05/24/2003 6:53:11 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1924 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson