Replies

Your paradigm of "The Sims" is just a game.

It is not a paradigm, it is an example. It shows that one can do whatever one pleases with a computer program and prove 'anything' one likes. I have already shown the fault in this program in modeling reality which of course you are trying with verbiage to forget. In addition, a model for the entire set of facts which affect life is far too complex (and indeed unknown in its entirety). So any model of such a reality is perforce not a true one.

In addition, see the post above. If evolution is true, why does it need models as proof? Why cannot it prove itself from real life? Science is about real observable things so by saying that evolution requires a simulation to give proof of itself you (and all evolutionists) are admitting that evolution is not science.

So far, you are the only person that has considered "The Sims" as other than a game.

Just because one cannot simulate all of reality does not imply that one cannot simulate some of reality. You better hope that people can simulate things such as nuclear reactor and weapons safety. Your life does depend on these simulations. Do you feel lucky? Well, do you?

No one needs models of evolution as proof. Creationists seem to be unable to grasp the idea that scientific theories do not require proof nor can any theory be proven.