Indeed you did, because, either a) apparently, your memory capacity does not exceed that of my old atari 800 computer, or b) you know that actually grappling with any of the possibilities I have been at pains to lay out for you would show up the shabby, transparent nature of your argument all too obviously. -- as you have once again demonstrated by listing all the requirements of a prokariote, and trying to pretend that these are requirements for abiogenesis.
Since you are unable to meet the challenge above you resort to the usual 'proofs' of evolution given here by evolutionists: lies, insults and doubletalk.
Tell you what. If you can show me where I offered you a "proof" of evolution, I'll withdraw my suspicion that you are a transparent, repetitive confidence artist who makes hay by demanding that I defend a thesis I do not subscribe to, but which you'd prefer that I did.
Indeed you did,
Now you remember. Then you go on to insulting me for bad memory when it was you who in post# 1538 said "Of course, the issue is that the you support abiogensis". Clearly you cannot meet the challenge of showing a single theory that can overcome the three problems which real science has shown make life from non-life utterly impossible. Stop the insults, stop the excuses, stop the doubletalk, stop the misrepresentation of my position and discuss the facts.