Your response appears to have been garbled in transmission, and came through hopelessly incoherent. Please retransmit.
Read Dr. Hawkings writings on the Uncertainty Principle.
Why don't you share with us what you think the Lucasian Professor wrote, and how it applies to what 10 people see when the watch cars collide?
No one sees the same EVENT the same.
Assuming this were true (with respect to an automobile collision), how does this relate to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle?
How long will we wait for the definitive answer as to how the Pyramids were built?
How long before we have the answer as to how South American Indians performed surgery on the skulls of people, when there are 2, 3, up to 5 holes in a skull?
Damned if I know. Since I've not commented on those subjects, I have no reason to respond to your unilateral out-of-place demand for an answer. Your feeble attempts to change the subject from your misuse of Heisenberg to something else, on which I didn't even comment, do not obligate me to respond.
Science has the evidence. They create models, have theories and yet they cannot agree. There have been carbon datings done on green leaves that say they are thousands of years old. Science has its failings.
And these statements are connected how to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle?
How terrible of you, trying to keep the newbie on track, and insisting that he explain his prior posting. Doncha know? We're supposed to let these creationoids tap-dance all around every topic, tossing out wild and unsupportable claims, ducking all serious questions, until we grow weary and just give up. It's the technique they learn by watching the master creationists debate. (But somehow, it doesn't work when it's all in writing and there are no time limits.)