Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Artificial Life Experiments Show How Complex Functions Can Evolve
NSF ^ | May 8, 2003 | Staff

Posted on 05/08/2003 10:11:06 AM PDT by Nebullis

Artificial Life Experiments Show How Complex Functions Can Evolve

Arlington, Va.—If the evolution of complex organisms were a road trip, then the simple country drives are what get you there. And sometimes even potholes along the way are important.

An interdisciplinary team of scientists at Michigan State University and the California Institute of Technology, with the help of powerful computers, has used a kind of artificial life, or ALife, to create a road map detailing the evolution of complex organisms, an old problem in biology.

In an article in the May 8 issue of the international journal Nature, Richard Lenski, Charles Ofria, Robert Pennock, and Christoph Adami report that the path to complex organisms is paved with a long series of simple functions, each unremarkable if viewed in isolation. "This project addresses a fundamental criticism of the theory of evolution, how complex functions arise from mutation and natural selection," said Sam Scheiner, program director in the division of environmental biology at the National Science Foundation (NSF), which funded the research through its Biocomplexity in the Environment initiative. "These simulations will help direct research on living systems and will provide understanding of the origins of biocomplexity."

Some mutations that cause damage in the short term ultimately become a positive force in the genetic pedigree of a complex organism. "The little things, they definitely count," said Lenski of Michigan State, the paper's lead author. "Our work allowed us to see how the most complex functions are built up from simpler and simpler functions. We also saw that some mutations looked like bad events when they happened, but turned out to be really important for the evolution of the population over a long period of time."

In the key phrase, "a long period of time," lies the magic of ALife. Lenski teamed up with Adami, a scientist at Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Ofria, a Michigan State computer scientist, to further explore ALife.

Pennock, a Michigan State philosopher, joined the team to study an artificial world inside a computer, a world in which computer programs take the place of living organisms. These computer programs go forth and multiply, they mutate and they adapt by natural selection.

The program, called Avida, is an artificial petri dish in which organisms not only reproduce, but also perform mathematical calculations to obtain rewards. Their reward is more computer time that they can use for making copies of themselves. Avida randomly adds mutations to the copies, thus spurring natural selection and evolution. The research team watched how these "bugs" adapted and evolved in different environments inside their artificial world.

Avida is the biologist's race car - a really souped up one. To watch the evolution of most living organisms would require thousands of years – without blinking. The digital bugs evolve at lightening speed, and they leave tracks for scientists to study.

"The cool thing is that we can trace the line of descent," Lenski said. "Out of a big population of organisms you can work back to see the pivotal mutations that really mattered during the evolutionary history of the population. The human mind can't sort through so much data, but we developed a tool to find these pivotal events."

There are no missing links with this technology.

Evolutionary theory sometimes struggles to explain the most complex features of organisms. Lenski uses the human eye as an example. It's obviously used for seeing, and it has all sorts of parts - like a lens that can be focused at different distances - that make it well suited for that use. But how did something so complicated as the eye come to be?

Since Charles Darwin, biologists have concluded that such features must have arisen through lots of intermediates and, moreover, that these intermediate structures may once have served different functions from what we see today. The crystalline proteins that make up the lens of the eye, for example, are related to those that serve enzymatic functions unrelated to vision. So, the theory goes, evolution borrowed an existing protein and used it for a new function.

"Over time," Lenski said, "an old structure could be tweaked here and there to improve it for its new function, and that's a lot easier than inventing something entirely new."

That's where ALife sheds light.

"Darwinian evolution is a process that doesn't specify exactly how the evolving information is coded," says Adami, who leads the Digital Life Laboratory at Caltech. "It affects DNA and computer code in much the same way, which allows us to study evolution in this electronic medium."

Many computer scientists and engineers are now using processes based on principles of genetics and evolution to solve complex problems, design working robots, and more. Ofria says that "we can then apply these concepts when trying to decide how best to solve computational problems."

"Evolutionary design," says Pennock, "can often solve problems better than we can using our own intelligence."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ai; crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 1,961-1,975 next last
To: Aric2000
Well, either we are going loooney, or he is becoming sane, I hope it's the later, and not the former. ;)

But, we would think it's us that are OK, wouldn't we...

781 posted on 05/09/2003 11:28:08 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
That is rather frightening, but, if he's a computer program, he's an awfully smart one, and they would have had to have let him evolve into what he is to make it that sophisticated.

No, I think your Schitzo/insomnia is probably the right answer, or else he really has no life.

For instance, my wife and I are celebrating our 10 year anniversary today, it was actually yesterday, but a Friday makes a lot more sense, so I will miss most of his craziness for the next 2 days.

I will be a bit busy with my own form of insomnia, hey hey, ;).

Yes, 10 years and 3 kids later, I have no idea how she puts up with me....LOL
782 posted on 05/09/2003 11:30:07 AM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
I can read it and understand it which I suspect is something you are unable to do.

I have a reasonable acquaintance with Attic Greek. OK, so let's rock and roll.

What looks like a reputable source

http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek

gives this definition of blepo

  1. to see, discern, of the bodily eye
    • with the bodily eye: to be possessed of sight, have the power of seeing
    • perceive by the use of the eyes: to see, look descry
    • to turn the eyes to anything: to look at, look upon, gaze at
    • to perceive by the senses, to feel
    • to discover by use, to know by experience
  2. metaph. to see with the mind's eye
    • to have (the power of) understanding
    • to discern mentally, observe, perceive, discover, understand
    • to turn the thoughts or direct the mind to a thing, to consider,
    • contemplate, to look at, to weigh carefully, examine
  3. in a geographical sense of places, mountains, buildings, etc. turning towards any quarter, as it were, facing it

So it appears that your claim, that 'ou blepomenon' means "things not being seen with the eyes" like wind and gravity, is far too narrow. In fact, the usage of blepo in Heb. 3;12, 3:19, and 10:25 clearly doesn't refer to seeing with the eyes. How do one's eyes 'see the day approaching', for example?

Materialistic cosmology denies the existence of said vacuum before the BB. So where did the vacuum come from?

The vacuum is nothingness, the void. Are you asking where nothing comes from?

783 posted on 05/09/2003 11:31:23 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
Sorry, I never made my point.

My point? I have a life, and a pretty good one too, if I do say so myself.
784 posted on 05/09/2003 11:32:59 AM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 782 | View Replies]

To: null and void
That's where the hope part came in....LOL
785 posted on 05/09/2003 11:33:44 AM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 781 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
How do one's eyes 'see the day approaching', for example?

The Koran says when you can distinguish a black thread from a white one...

786 posted on 05/09/2003 11:35:06 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 783 | View Replies]

To: MOX
Everything's relative. Two and a half years may not be founder-member status, but it's definitely past newbieness.
787 posted on 05/09/2003 11:35:58 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Hey- I thought you were going to give me the last word.

If you know a little Greek, you know a lexicon lists the various meanings and tries to give the context in which the meaning might be found. It's much like English in that regard: context determines meaning. What does "ball" mean without a context? Like I said before, the Author of faith gets to write the definition. It does not hinge on your interpretation of Heb 11.

The vacuum is nothingness, the void. Are you asking where nothing comes from?

A vacuum is something. Space is something. Nothing is nothing. Nothing is not the same as something. Therefore a vacuum is not nothing. Where did the vacuum come from? Where did the space in which the vacuum could exist come from? Before the BB there was no space. How does an explosion create space? How does an explosion happen without space? What are the laws of physics that allow for such a thing?

788 posted on 05/09/2003 11:42:34 AM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 783 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Wow Professor, we signed up within 12 days of each other. No, I don't think we're newbies anymore.
789 posted on 05/09/2003 11:42:58 AM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 787 | View Replies]

To: null and void
A coma is bigger than a period

A coma is what describes your mental condition. Your Ad Hominem is noted and further replies from you will be ignored.

790 posted on 05/09/2003 11:46:38 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 757 | View Replies]

To: Dataman; Right Wing Professor
Be nice professor, his mind just can't seem to fathom science at all.

It makes no sense to him, so he falls back on, "godidit" like a good little sheeple.

He just cannot admit that maybe he does not have all the info to make an informed decision.

Much easier to follow, then to expand your knowledge and make your own decisions. Much easier to do something because the book tells you to, then to actually have to make a decision for yourself.

That responsibility thing is a Bi$%^.

Besides, physics is SO HARD to understand, so much easier to say "godidit" and be done.
791 posted on 05/09/2003 11:47:34 AM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Performance went up and the price went down.

Ah, but from the point of view of Intel or AMD or Motorola, you bought another chip when you already had one. Since the manufacturing cost of a single chip is zilch compared to the development cost and the capital invested in the factory, they just effectively doubled the sales price of their goods. Every time a performance enhancement convinces someone to purchase a new product, the money rolls in.

You could get into pointless arguments about whether someone was exaggerating about the price of a chip or the effect on market share, but it is a fact that sales in technology are driven by incremental enhancements in performance.

And the Pentium IV has perhaps five times the transistor count of a 486 chip, but isn't significantly larger.

792 posted on 05/09/2003 11:49:49 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 729 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
I'd rather know God personally than all the bs in the world !
793 posted on 05/09/2003 11:50:37 AM PDT by f.Christian (( Marching orders: comfort the afflicted // afflict the comfortable ! ! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 791 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC; null and void
I think you upset poor AndrewC, apologize to the poor creature, he can't take a lot of criticizsm at once.

You must feed it to him slowly, and in small pieces, or he just comes apart at the seams.

And of course he undertood what you actually meant, but needed to take offense at something so that he could have an excuse to put you on his ignore list.

Sometimes, too much knowledge can be a bad thing. And he thinks that it would be a VERY bad thing for him to have too much knowledge. It might bring his worldview into question, and lord knows, we wouldn't want that.
794 posted on 05/09/2003 11:51:14 AM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Personally? Wow, I'd love to meet god personally.

Set me up an appointment, would you please?

I'll see what I can arrange to get over there to meet him.

Just name the time, I will make the arrangements to get there. Whatever time is convenient for god.

So lucky for you that he actually comes to see you personally.
795 posted on 05/09/2003 11:53:46 AM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
I have read elsewhere, that this device had been patented in 2000 and since then there have been a number of others that have been submitted.

Why would the person who was involved in the process make the referenced statement in 2003? Why would the following be written in the February 2003 Scientific American?

The first patent for an invention created by genetic programming may soon be granted.

796 posted on 05/09/2003 11:53:53 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 759 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Killing is a physical action. Murder requires an illicit motive. Everyone accepts this basic distinction. What they argue about is what constitutes an illicit motive.

LOL, thank you for the sanctimony and edumacation.

Now why don't you define murder. Then you can take a position as to whether murder is absolutely wrong.

Or not.

797 posted on 05/09/2003 12:00:17 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
There has been a patent already granted, this I know, but I am not going to go search for the patent number for you.

and actually, the invention was based on evolutionary programming. The computer was allowed to evolve the circuit. I don't pretend to understand the intricacies of it, so I am not even going to try to explain it.
798 posted on 05/09/2003 12:03:20 PM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 796 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
And you are making sense again, this is downright scary.

Sounds like someone's been listening to cable TV commercials, and has some very expensive pieces of paper on the wall.

f.C is right when he asserts that most patents are worthless. And some very good ones are simply ignored by big corporations. FM radio was in the courts until at least a decade after the inventor died. My current company has a patent that is being infringed, but the offending company has calculated that the legal costs will prohibit any successful challenge.

799 posted on 05/09/2003 12:14:21 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 772 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Yep, I have had a friend with the same problem, that is why he uses the poor man's patent along with the normal patent program.

Woohoo #800?
800 posted on 05/09/2003 12:16:12 PM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 1,961-1,975 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson