Skip to comments.
Richard Perle Libel Watch, Week 9
Slate ^
| 5/7/03
| Jack Shafer
Posted on 05/08/2003 9:05:07 AM PDT by Egregious Philbin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Egregious Philbin
How did you like this article?
2
posted on
05/08/2003 9:31:58 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
I dunno. I haven't been following this that closely, but it seems to have come to a head, and Perle does look bad. I was curious what people thought of the situation on FR. How did you like it? I think this guy Shafer does a decent job over at Slate.
To: Egregious Philbin
The article sounds bad for Perle.
4
posted on
05/08/2003 9:37:51 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
If Perle weren't such an a** about it before I think we'd see less of the snowball effect. I wonder if this will mean bad things for those in the Bush Administration who have similar ties to industry but have remained low key about them.
To: Egregious Philbin
AThe President is looking so good right now the Dems are going crazy looking for dirt.The outrage they express over the carrier landing is laughable.
6
posted on
05/08/2003 9:48:32 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Egregious Philbin
I believe Feith( now on DPB) was involved in the Lorel lobbying effort as well. I remember when we were screaming treason at klintoon over this here.
7
posted on
05/08/2003 9:49:20 AM PDT
by
steve50
(neocons, the "new coke" of conservatives)
To: Egregious Philbin
I knew when I heard Perle threaten the libel suit that his attorney would talk him out of it when he cooled down-- libel suits are VERY difficult to win, and the slimer Hersch didn't actually SAY anything anyway, it was all woulda coulda shoulda innuendo (wink, wink). Political B.S.
Anyway, Perle is fine-- these idiots will leave him alone after the election. Right now he's a Rumsfield/Bush proxy, but they'll lose interest once Bush begins his second term.
;)
8
posted on
05/08/2003 10:01:35 AM PDT
by
walden
To: walden
It's coming--I have that on excellent authority---
To: Egregious Philbin
Great picture. The old saying "by the time you're fifty, you'll have the face that you deserve" comes to mind.
10
posted on
05/08/2003 10:22:58 AM PDT
by
mr.pink
To: the Real fifi
Oh? COOL!
11
posted on
05/08/2003 10:29:18 AM PDT
by
walden
To: walden
I like Richard Perle and Newt Gingrich and turn a cocked eye at them that dasn't!
12
posted on
05/08/2003 10:40:17 AM PDT
by
gcruse
(Vice is nice, but virtue can hurt you. --Bill Bennett)
To: MEG33
How did you like this article?Blah, blah, blah. They really got nothing here, and have to fall back on "this looks bad" b.s. Oh, and I like that little bit of innuendo, trying to imply merely by textual proximity that Perle had anything to do with Loral's transfers of missle guidance technology. (He didn't. They hired Perle well after this, in part to ensure they wouldn't f-up like that again.)
Perle, a grandstander extraordinaire...
Yeah, as if. It wasn't by "grandstanding" that Perle cleared Soviet missles from Eastern Europe, and it wasn't because of "grandstanding" that he was probably the single most respected (and feared) American official by the Soviet politburo and military. It was by standing firm.
Perle has always stood for American strength and security, and has never given an inch unless he believed that it was in America's interest to do so. THAT is why he is being attacked. (Just look at who's doing the attacking.) I for one will never forget what Perle did for this country. I will never forget his repeatedly putting his own career on the line to defend Reagan's SDI program from the leftists, or to defend pro-American officials from attacks by the blame-America-firsters.
It will take real evidence, not innuendo, to convince me that Perle has changed.
13
posted on
05/08/2003 10:52:47 AM PDT
by
Stultis
To: mr.pink
The old saying "by the time you're fifty, you'll have the face that you deserve" comes to mind.Great. Hey, mr. pink, maybe Slate can offer you a job helping to trash pro-defense Americans?
14
posted on
05/08/2003 10:58:05 AM PDT
by
Stultis
To: Stultis
You're doing great.
15
posted on
05/08/2003 11:03:57 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Egregious Philbin
Wonder how long it took Slate to dig up the most flattering photo of Perle it could find.
Leni
16
posted on
05/08/2003 11:10:06 AM PDT
by
MinuteGal
(THIS JUST IN ! Astonishing fare reduction for FReeps Ahoy Cruise! Check it out, pronto!)
To: Egregious Philbin
. . . Perle received a classified North Korea/Iraq briefing in February at the DPB from the Defense Intelligence Agency - and then three weeks later gave a briefing of his own at an investment seminar run by Goldman Sachs on how to profit from possible conflicts with those two countries.
It pays to have friends in high places!
17
posted on
05/08/2003 11:15:44 AM PDT
by
Marianne
To: Stultis
Sorry, but I don't like, nor trust, Mr. Perle.
I was very happy when he had to resign his chairmanship over his tawdry dealings/profiteering attempt. IMHO, he should have been fired as Global Crossing seems to have been a fruadulent Clintonista organization that fleeced a lot of honest Americans. That kinda' sleaze bothers me, whereas for Mr. Perle, it was merely an opportunity to fatten up on what was left on the bones of the shareholders oink-oink.
18
posted on
05/08/2003 11:16:37 AM PDT
by
mr.pink
To: MinuteGal
They probably have a whole file marked "unflattering photos of dangerous warmongers, cowboys and joos." Doubtless Dubya is in there, and Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, and even old guys like Weinberger and Shultz. It would be a badge of honor to have your likeness there.
19
posted on
05/08/2003 11:19:02 AM PDT
by
Stultis
To: mr.pink
That kinda' sleaze bothers me, whereas for Mr. Perle, it was merely an opportunity to fatten up on what was left on the bones of the shareholders oink-oinkSo, like the leftists, you associate Perle with the fraud at Global Crossing. It's immaterial that he was hired long afterwards. It's still perfectly acceptable, to you, to smear him, and blame him for the loss to shareholders, even as he was advising on a deal that might have recovered some of those losses.
20
posted on
05/08/2003 11:25:47 AM PDT
by
Stultis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson