[Only1choice____Freedom]

OK, so they found chemical agents in the water.
That's not the smoking gun.
So Saddam fires a banned missle at a mall.
That's not the smoking gun.
So they found missles ready to fire with chemical agents.
That's not the smoking gun.
So they find the pesticide coctails.
That's not the smoking gun.
So they found barrels of agents buried in the desert.
That's not the smoking gun.
So they find the Biolab.
That's not the smoking gun.

So what's it going to take?
Do we really need more proof?
Is it really proof they (the media) want?
If we find thousands of barrels of nerve agent and weapons grade plutonium, will anything ever be enough to convince the liberal traitors that Bush was right?

[Paul Ross]

Is it really proof they (the media) want? If we find thousands of barrels of nerve agent and weapons grade plutonium, will anything ever be enough to convince the liberal traitors that Bush was right?

Short answer: No. (but you already knew that! :-) )

[Baseballguy]

When the truth is in thier favor. Its crazy to look at a ballot and have 5 people say what the intent of the voter is. Nothing in this world is black and white.