Replies

"Boortz was aked a couple of questions, first should the Governor execise leadership and criticize those students who particpated in an all white prom"

First, it's not Boortz's responsibility to comment on what or what not the Governor says. Should the Governor comment on the black only party held at Spellman College in Georgia at the end of each semester? Do you want him to say something with the large Vietnamese population has a "Asian Only" private party too? It's an assinine question and Boortz rightfully blew O'Hubcap out of the water.

"don't you (Boortz) agree that it is wrong for students to organize an all white prom at the public school."

Because that's factually a Clintonized statement he didn't have to answer it. It was not a "prom at the public school" and it was not "organized" there. It was organized without the consent or approval of the school administration. So that's another reach that the liberal media loves to harp on.

"Boortz did not condemn the actions of the students but instead defended them by changing the subject and claiming that they had the right to freedom of association."

Boortz has never chagned the subject. He's been 100 percent consistent on this subject. It is a matter of freedom of association, period, end of convesration.

"He essentially supported their racist behaviour."

Let's use your logic:

Because I did not hop on to my boat and help rescue the 4 Cubans up the way from me yesterday, that means I support Castro killing and jailing political opposition.

That's pretty good. I see you have the NEA seal of approval on your postings now. I hope this response is not too narrow to you.