Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ditto
That's true with nearly every energy source. Internal combustion energy efficiency is what? Something less than 50%. A conventional coal-fired boiler is something less than 45%. Even the latest gas turbine co-generation plants a pushing it to get much above 50%.

So, we burn some fuel, inefficiently, to create H2 and then burn the H2 to, inefficiently, move an automobile or to generate electricity? Sounds rather inefficient.

43 posted on 05/07/2003 12:56:46 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
So, we burn some fuel, inefficiently, to create H2 and then burn the H2 to, inefficiently, move an automobile or to generate electricity? Sounds rather inefficient.

That wasn't what I suggested at all. Go back and read the post again. Energy sources are not fungible. Some are best suited for one application but totally wrong for others. A blind measure of efficiency even if technically accurate is meaningless economically.

67 posted on 05/07/2003 2:00:40 PM PDT by Ditto (You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson