Skip to comments.
Children are the losers in this sexual revolution
The Scotsman ^
| Tue 6 May 2003
| GILLIAN BOWDITCH
Posted on 05/07/2003 12:31:05 AM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: nickcarraway
Freedom without laws is a riot!
2
posted on
05/07/2003 12:47:33 AM PDT
by
Russell Scott
(The answer is Jesus Christ, what's the question?)
To: nickcarraway
Future generations are going to be very angry with the current ones.
3
posted on
05/07/2003 12:49:18 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been banned.)
To: nickcarraway
"Where do babies come from, maddy?"I swear, I don't understand this species at all...
4
posted on
05/07/2003 1:02:45 AM PDT
by
MrJingles
("Nietzsche is dead." - God)
To: nickcarraway; sauropod
"These men want to preserve their ability to procreate," he declares. Then they shouldn't cut their dicks off, sheesh...
To: hellinahandcart
"Paging Dr Kutchakokhov, addadictomy in room 9."
6
posted on
05/07/2003 7:11:00 AM PDT
by
Sender
To: nickcarraway; Remedy
Weird.
To: nickcarraway; scripter; Polycarp
Bump & Ping
8
posted on
05/07/2003 7:44:13 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - Become a monthly donor!)
To: EdReform; .45MAN; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; Antoninus; aposiopetic; ...
Thanks for the ping.
Now science has reduced babies to the status of commodities. Your partner may be gay, dead or non-existent, but that will not preclude your right to procreate.
Just one more subject where, as usual, The Roman Catholic Church has been 100% correct from day one:
2375 Research aimed at reducing human sterility is to be encouraged, on condition that it is placed "at the service of the human person, of his inalienable rights, and his true and integral good according to the design and will of God."166
2376 Techniques that entail the dissociation of husband and wife, by the intrusion of a person other than the couple (donation of sperm or ovum, surrogate uterus), are gravely immoral. These techniques (heterologous artificial insemination and fertilization) infringe the child's right to be born of a father and mother known to him and bound to each other by marriage. They betray the spouses' "right to become a father and a mother only through each other."167
2377 Techniques involving only the married couple (homologous artificial insemination and fertilization) are perhaps less reprehensible, yet remain morally unacceptable. They dissociate the sexual act from the procreative act. The act which brings the child into existence is no longer an act by which two persons give themselves to one another, but one that "entrusts the life and identity of the embryo into the power of doctors and biologists and establishes the domination of technology over the origin and destiny of the human person. Such a relationship of domination is in itself contrary to the dignity and equality that must be common to parents and children."168 "Under the moral aspect procreation is deprived of its proper perfection when it is not willed as the fruit of the conjugal act, that is to say, of the specific act of the spouses' union . . . . Only respect for the link between the meanings of the conjugal act and respect for the unity of the human being make possible procreation in conformity with the dignity of the person."169
9
posted on
05/07/2003 8:03:53 AM PDT
by
Polycarp
("When a mother can kill her own child, what is left of the West to save?" - Mother Theresa)
To: Polycarp
bump.
To: nickcarraway
When weve reached a point where infertility professors claim to have a duty to help transsexual men become both mother and father to a child, it is clearly time to toughen the guidelines Oops! This journalist may soon be out of a job once the PC crowd gets wind of this article. The Scotsman? What type of circulation do they .... er .... did they have prior to this?
Of course, the journalist is absolutely correct. We're going to hell in a handcart. The children are indeed the victims of a selfish, greedy, self-centered society.
11
posted on
05/07/2003 8:20:17 AM PDT
by
NYer
(Laudate Dominum)
To: Polycarp
If you worship at the cult of the individual, however, the gods demand sacrifice and that sacrifice is increasingly being paid by children. I've been saying for years that it's plain old-fashioned human sacrifice. There's nothing new under the sun. The fate of the Carthaginians and the Mayans is particularly instructive.
12
posted on
05/07/2003 8:26:39 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(Deo Vindice Christian School - "You may be whatever you resolve to be.")
To: nickcarraway
Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket? Why is there fire and brimstone down there? Why is that man with the pitchfork laughing at us? Why are all those other people down there weeping and wailing and gnashing their teeth? We just wanted to live a hedonistic lifesytle. Can we continue doing so when we get to where we're going?
13
posted on
05/07/2003 9:42:17 AM PDT
by
Luna
(Evil will not triumph...God is at the helm)
To: nickcarraway
Yes, children, but also the mothers who canno bear children due to the killi....er....abortion.
14
posted on
05/07/2003 9:44:43 AM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Polycarp
**"When a mother can kill her own child, what is left of the West to save?" - Mother Theresa**
Fantastic tagline!
15
posted on
05/07/2003 9:47:03 AM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Salvation
**but also the mothers who canno bear children due to the killi....er....abortion.**
canno == cannot
16
posted on
05/07/2003 9:47:52 AM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: nickcarraway
BUMP
To: nickcarraway
Excellent post! Poor kids.
18
posted on
05/07/2003 11:49:55 AM PDT
by
RAT Patrol
(Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
To: nickcarraway
This is so sad. A parent's strongest instincts are to do whatever is best for their child. But these people are so obsessed with their own agenda and lifestyle that they are willing to risk messing up their kids' lives in order to indoctrinate a new generation.
I hope these kids will be strong enough to not be screwed up by their parent's choices. Otherwise we will have a whole new generation of problems to deal with.
19
posted on
05/07/2003 1:05:36 PM PDT
by
BamaGirl
To: Luna
I don't believe God punishes us for the sins of our brothers and sisters. If we live a good righteous life (we, individually) then we shall reap the awards promised to us in the afterlife.
I say we leave the judging to the Lord, lest we be judged ourselves.
God bless.
20
posted on
05/07/2003 1:17:37 PM PDT
by
Laurie S
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson