Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
You ranted, raved, whined, beggged, and spewed, but you couldn't even find one case or authority to support the assertion that state and local regulation of firearms are violative of the 2nd Amendment.

Already done on that other thread. You just ignored, obfuscated, denied, cried in your beer, or tried to change the topic for 1100+ posts.

You approve of the 9th Circuits ruling. For the purposes of this thread, and my reason for pinging you to it, that was all I wanted to do.

Or do you now want to change your tune on the 9th Circuits ruling?

79 posted on 05/07/2003 10:31:42 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
Already done on that other thread.

Not even once. It seems nothing has changed.

You approve of the 9th Circuits ruling.

The opinion is filled with historical and legal falsehoods, rather like your posts.

As 5th Circuit Judge Robert M. Parker pointed out in his concurring opinion in United States v. Emerson, "The determination whether the rights bestowed by the Second Amendment are collective or individual is entirely unnecessary to resolve this case and has no bearing on the judgment we dictate by this opinion."

80 posted on 05/07/2003 10:42:01 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson