Skip to comments.
Army Ants Defy Evolution
Cornell News ^
| 5/5/03
| Sean Brady
Posted on 05/06/2003 5:50:29 PM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
This is an interesting 'find'.
FRegards, MM
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
... the entomologist showed the ants evolved only once ...
On about the fifth or the sixth day. And Hashem said something like, it is good, only really, really creepy.
2
posted on
05/06/2003 5:58:00 PM PDT
by
Asclepius
(to the barricades)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
"the supercontinent Gondwana" Is this what we're calling it now?
3
posted on
05/06/2003 6:02:14 PM PDT
by
weegee
(NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
I'm not seeing how this "defies" evolution -- they look like they're doing pretty good by themselves. You're only going to evolve if there's a) something that you're doing wrong, b) there's a better way to do it, or c) some external event happens to change you or your surroundings.
4
posted on
05/06/2003 6:05:43 PM PDT
by
lelio
To: All
The original title of the article is this
Army ants, as voracious as ever, have defied evolution for 100 million years, Cornell entomologist finds.
The revised title for the posted article is highly misleading. Many species remain relatively unchanged for long periods of time. That is not in any way a contradiction of the theory of evolution. This is an interesting article, if one cares about army ants, but it's presented in the wrong light.
5
posted on
05/06/2003 6:16:36 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: lelio
Yeah, but the weird thing is that they just sort of appeared. Bam -- one day, no army ants. The next, there they are. No primitive forms, no transitional quasi-ant fossils, just whammo, ants, almost as if they were suddenly created from out of nothing by some vast, creative intellect.
In other words, they're pretty much like life itself.
I'm glad army ants can't live here. Those things are scary. Anyone who has ever faced off against solenopsis invicta (the imported fire ant) knows that the family Formiciae is nothing to fool around with. A fire ant colony can kill you -- or make you wish you were dead.
Lucky for use they can't use tools or we'd all be out of a job.
6
posted on
05/06/2003 6:17:05 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: lelio
Charlton Heston was in a movie where he fought the Army Ants and he won.
7
posted on
05/06/2003 6:18:00 PM PDT
by
LauraJean
(Fukai please pass the squid sauce)
To: weegee
The translation I learned here in Texas for the vanished supercontinent of Gondwana was "Goneyonder."
8
posted on
05/06/2003 6:19:42 PM PDT
by
sam_paine
To: lelio
To: B-Chan
A fire ant colony can kill you -- or make you wish you were dead. Bah. A pint of gasoline makes them immediately docile, with or without the match.
To: LauraJean
Which flick was that ? I can recall The Omega Man, where he beat diseased Mutants, and of course, the "damned dirty apes" of Planet of the Apes. . .
11
posted on
05/06/2003 6:29:35 PM PDT
by
Salgak
(don't mind me: the orbital mind control lasers are making me write this. . .)
To: sam_paine
Is ant Jemina related? How did she evolve?
To: lelio
Evolution in action.
13
posted on
05/06/2003 6:32:38 PM PDT
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
To: LauraJean
That would be The Naked Jungle by George Pal:
14
posted on
05/06/2003 6:33:57 PM PDT
by
weegee
(NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
"supercontinent Gondwana"
hey, what happened to the name? I thought is was called something else. What was it? I can't recall.
To: PatrickHenry
Touchy, touchy...Defying evolution or defying it for 100 million years. Just semantics, right?
16
posted on
05/06/2003 6:46:02 PM PDT
by
dubyagee
To: weegee
I would imiagine that the old name wasn't afro-centric enough for some - I'm still trying to remember what the old name was. Any idea? Maybe started with a P or B... It's killin me....
To: weegee
"the supercontinent Gondwana" Is this what we're calling it now?
Pangea, the ultimate supercontinent, broke up into to two land masses first. Laurasia, the northern continent, was comprised of Europe, Asia and North American. Gondawanaland (old style term apparently replaced) was the southern mass with India, Africa, South American and Antarctica crammed into on major land mass.

Late Jurassic Period approx 152 MYa
18
posted on
05/06/2003 6:48:58 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: Texas_Jarhead
Gondwana, it's been called that for eons.
19
posted on
05/06/2003 6:48:58 PM PDT
by
tet68
(Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
To: sam_paine
Pangea!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson