Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sarasmom
"Question for the military types: Is it significantly more dangerous to do a tailhook landing on a small jet as opposed to flying out on a helo?"

First of all, by carrier aircraft standards, the S-3 is not all that small. It's the second or third largest A/C that is operational on the carriers. The E-2 and C-2 are slightly larger and the C-2 can come aboard heavier. But then again, that's what Condi Rice and others came aboard on, and she was riding backwards and had couldn't see the landing coming. (Might be an advantage for some, but I'd rather see whats happening)

IMHO, helocopters, while more dangerous in general, are safer to land on the carrier than trapping aboard in a relatively heavy jet, especially one like the S-3 with no afterburners to help with the "go round" if you fail to catch a wire.

112 posted on 05/06/2003 9:40:16 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
Shush!
Dont make me order my F-15 CAP to shut you up!
smirk quietly,or feel a need for a chute and SAR forces.
LOL!
113 posted on 05/06/2003 9:48:19 PM PDT by sarasmom (Punish France.Ignore Germany.Forgive Russia...Free Israel from terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson