Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AdmSmith
No, nothing has changed. there are still people trying to violate the thermodynamic principles, building perpetual motion machines, trisecting an angle etc.

Nobody ever claimed cold fusion energy was from nothing. If it exists, it would be from the same source as "hot" fusion, or fission for that matter. Namely the loss of mass in a nuclear reaction. E=MC2 and all that.

The thing about "cold fusion" was that, at least initially, no one was able to explain how the nuclei of the atoms were forced close enough together to fuse, against the electrostatic forces tending to keep them apart, without using the brute force technique of simply heating them up until the speed of collisions between the nuclui was enough to overcome the electrocstatic repulsion.

12 posted on 05/06/2003 2:30:48 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
Try the standard model and calculate the possibility of a cold fusion reaction with a atoms at room temperature. Almost zero. Assume that you force the atoms closer => higher possibility. How do you do that and what is the energy requirements? From where do you get this energy?

Spend your research time with better projects, there a a lot to discover or calculate.
15 posted on 05/06/2003 2:38:06 PM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson