So evolutionists, rather than creationists, properly bear the burden of proof for establishing the logical grounds for what is the more unlikely claim for the origin of universe and life. Yes. Unlikely with a probability < statistical zero.
God created = stupid. Nothing created itself = science.
Frog-> Prince = fairy tale. Frog + time-> Prince = science.
God made man from dust = stupid. Nothing made man from rain on rocks = science.
God is eternal = ignorance. Dirt is eternal = science.
Ah, yes, the wonderful fun false dichotomy of Christian Biblical literalism vs. purely naturalistic views.
Do you really believe that there are no religions in the world apart from Christianity or are you just ignoring them because they make your assertions weaker?