[Dimensio]

And as far as the Chinese MAKING fossils, our scientists would be having a fit if they found out they were fakes, and so far not a word has been spoken.

Well, there is prescedent. Keep in mind the fakes throughout history, such as Piltdown man, that were exposed by Creation scientists...

...er, wait, it wasn't creation scientists who exposed Piltdown man. It was scientists who accepted evolution but who were skeptical of the claims regarding Piltdown man. Nevermind.

[Con X-Poser]

X:And as far as the Chinese MAKING fossils, our scientists would be having a fit if they found out they were fakes, and so far not a word has been spoken.

D: Well, there is prescedent. Keep in mind the fakes throughout history, such as Piltdown man, that were exposed by Creation scientists...

No matter who discovered they were fakes, the fact remains - they were FAKES. That includes Piltdown, archaeoraptor, brontosaurus, the Cardiff ichthyosaurs, the Smithsonian triceratops, hesperopithicus, peppered moths, the Mars rock, Haeckel's embryo drawings, speechless apeman, Huxley's monera, and whatever fraud is exposed next week.

The Mar's rock was refuted by creationists long before evolutionists were force to admit the truth. Then they gave the same reasons for discrediting it that the creationists had given. Suddenly, what had been derided for months as "creationist nonsense" and "religious propaganda" suddenly became "science". What a transformation - what a miracle!

One other reason more of them weren't exposed by creationists is that creationists are forbidden to examine the evolutionary relics. Let's see a creationist get to examine "Lucy". When Dr. Cuozzo did get to examine several Neandertal skulls, he showed how many of the jaws were misaligned, and the museums reluctantly made the corrections that they *had* to make, before chasing him out of Africa so they didn't have to make any more.