Replies

Stanz: The problem is, at least according to some of the responses I have seen here over time, that creationists do not accept the validity of the fossil record or DNA testing.

gore3000: No, what the opponents of evolution do not accept is made up stories. That is two different things. The fossil record does not support evolution. The Cambrian explosion totally contradicts evolution, so much in fact that it made Gould and Eldredge give up on Darwinian evolution. The fossil record is also full of gaps in the most important places - such as in mammalian evolution. The greatest change in organism functioning in vertebrates - and the most recent also. This change should because of both these reasons be the most detailed, the fullest, and best supported of all the changes in species and yet there is practically no evidence at all for the gradual evolution of mammals.

As to DNA evidence, there is none. The DNA evidence contradicts evolution. The evolutionists have to 'pick and choose' similarities amongst the millions of species in existence with thousands of different genes to make up what seems like an argument for their side. Anyone can support their side by picking and choosing what fits their theory. The problem for evolution is that there are numerous examples where the DNA does not fit the evolutionary 'tree'.

Doctor Stochastic (FIVE TIMES and counting): Non-responsive. How long ago do you feel that the Cambrian occurred?

Who is being non-responsive? Gore300 made SEVERAL valid points and the Doctor has IGNORED EVERY ONE OF THEM and keeps parroting, "How long ago do you feel that the Cambrian occurred?"

Come on Doctor, ANSWER what was put to you before you ask something and then accuse gore300 of evasion.

Pot, kettle, black, ... it seems the Doctor is a quack.