That's not what you were saying in post 428:
The officer was focused on protecting the public, that's his job.
That is his job as a police officer WITHIN his official jurisdiction. And it is NOT the role of a police officer to police SPEECH or what is being taught. Once he goes outside his jurisdiction, he is just another private citizen and jurisdiction is not the proper term for what he is doing. And the super already said that he shouldn't have been there - that is more a problem for the custodian who let him in, but IMO it's still unethical for a cop on duty in one jurisdiction to leave that jurisdiction to pursue a personal political agenda.
You keep sliding your position, which makes it impossible to hold a rational debate.
So dirtboy, 'ditch' (no pun intended) the attitude or direct your posts to ALL so they dont show up in my queue.
Don't worry, you ain't worth the trouble - I prefer to debate people who don't constantly move the target.
Irrelevant, I left enough latitude in my argument to slide in that direction. You on the other hand have left no latitude in your positions.
unethical for a cop on duty
Not On Duty
I prefer to debate people
Doesnt sound like you prefer to debate people... sounds more like you are being quite defensive of a weak position, and then offering thinly veiled insults to veneer your arguments with a reinforcement of intellectual elitism. You are definitely welcome to not respond.