Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dwills
i'm betting on brownies

Could be, but I think he was probably just exposed to some second-hand smoke, and the traces of THC found in his system had nothing to do with his ill-health. On the other hand, if his folks did indeed feed him ganja brownies (or cookies) or intentionally blow high-grade smoke in the kid's face, then his condition probably was a result of the THC consumption, and his parents should be held liable.

8 posted on 05/05/2003 9:42:47 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Mojo
From what I've read it's nearly impossible to inhale enough second hand smoke to test positive for marijuana.

Of course that was referring to people taking drug tests who might have been exposed to secondhand smoke at parties. I imagine if you were a toddler living with a bunch of chronic potheads things might be different.

10 posted on 05/05/2003 10:50:06 PM PDT by elmer fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson