Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WIPEOUT: NEXT ROUND IN THE PERMO-TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION DEBATE
From New Scientist | 26 April 2003 | Michael Benton

Posted on 05/05/2003 3:56:36 PM PDT by Mike Darancette

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: PatrickHenry
lurking with amused detachment
41 posted on 05/06/2003 10:29:02 AM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
ditto
42 posted on 05/06/2003 10:47:39 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Light Speed
I don't go hard on the man..he's a Genius..

I found Worlds in Collision very convincing ... when I was 16. The problem with the way Velikovsky's work is bandied about on these threads, his name often mentioned in reverential tones, is that V got it spectacularly wrong. Thought-provoking, yes. Entertaining, yes. Nevertheless, he made a thought-provoking, entertaining mess of it.

Whatever his IQ may have been, he was a dilettante, almost always working outside of any area of personal expertise. It's all wrong. That's worth mentioning, too.

43 posted on 05/06/2003 11:17:06 AM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: longshadow; PatrickHenry
lunatics-on-the-loose placemarker

739 posted on 05/06/2003 10:50 AM PDT by longshadow [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies | Report Abuse

Thanks....

Looks like you guys just Lurk and mock people.

44 posted on 05/06/2003 11:27:55 AM PDT by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

"Guess there is allways a place for the one liner:...Did IQ's suddenly drop while I was away?

45 posted on 05/06/2003 11:40:33 AM PDT by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Cool article. Now, I have a question. What happens when Creationists read articles like this?

If you read an article like this and understand it, how can you not believe in evolution?

Abiogenesis is a completely different concept than evolution. I don't have a problem with rejecting abiogenesis -- as yet there is no scientific proof that life on earth evolved spontaneously from unliving matter -- maybe some living creatures hitched a ride on a meteorite, maybe God specially created life on earth when the conditions were right, who knows?

But to reject evolution seems totally nonsensical to me. The evidence is right there for anyone to see.

46 posted on 05/06/2003 12:33:14 PM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
The evidence is right there for anyone to see.

It is, isn't it? But some don't want to know.

47 posted on 05/06/2003 12:45:29 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: bert
That is Suveria jeepus

Shouldn't the Permian version therefore be Suveriamimus jeepus? Over so long a time span, there can be no question of a direct relation.

48 posted on 05/06/2003 1:30:30 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Grut
Ok all this scientific stuff confuses me...

so tell me if I buy the 97 Ford Explorer I have my eye on and factoring in this article and all the evidence so far in the global warming debate...

Will I contribute to global warming by driving it thus causing New York and L.A. to sink beneath the oceans?

And if the above is true then is this necessarily a "Bad" thing?
49 posted on 05/06/2003 1:42:13 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
You didn't mention what happens to France. That's important to know.
50 posted on 05/06/2003 2:27:22 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Grut
The things you can learn on FRee Republic are endless.
51 posted on 05/06/2003 2:28:57 PM PDT by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Light Speed

52 posted on 05/06/2003 5:09:46 PM PDT by visualops (You can't have any pudding if you don't eat your meat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
as yet there is no scientific proof that life on earth evolved spontaneously from unliving matter...

But which attitude is more likely to lead to productive research -- the belief that abiogensis cannot happen and there is no point in looking for evidence, or the belief that it probably happened at least once somewhere, somehow?

53 posted on 05/06/2003 5:19:07 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: visualops
Thanks for the photo..did a properties link to the site its from...cool.

Hope this link holds...


54 posted on 05/06/2003 6:36:29 PM PDT by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: js1138
>>which attitude is more likely to lead to productive research<<

Looking, obviously. Even if (and I have no idea) originally life was NOT the result of abiogenesis, that doesn't mean that we can't replicate the results in a laboratory.

The villagers in Frankenstein might not agree . . . .
55 posted on 05/06/2003 6:58:57 PM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Light Speed
Ah I loved that movie, the dragons were awesome!
56 posted on 05/06/2003 7:30:09 PM PDT by visualops (You can't have any pudding if you don't eat your meat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: visualops
I liked it...kinda was hoping for more Technology vs Dragons...

Dragon Mythology is interesting...one area of the world especially..Central America

There's a Temple you may have seen...The Temple of Kulkulcan...with the Dragon heads at the base.

During the equinoxes..the suns shadow falls on the pyramid stairs ,the Dragons shadow appears to descend into the Earth...really cool.

57 posted on 05/06/2003 7:42:05 PM PDT by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
Perhaps they are thinking....hogwash, for it to be valid science, you have to see it while it's happening. The same criticism would have to be leveled against astronomers and cosmologists studying events that occurred billions of years ago. Just a guess. I can't fathom the mindset.
58 posted on 05/07/2003 11:55:04 AM PDT by Ben Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

An oldie:

· Catastrophism ping list · join · view topics · view or post blog messages · bookmark ·

59 posted on 08/20/2006 2:51:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson