Skip to comments.
WIPEOUT: NEXT ROUND IN THE PERMO-TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION DEBATE
From New Scientist
| 26 April 2003
| Michael Benton
Posted on 05/05/2003 3:56:36 PM PDT by Mike Darancette
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: PatrickHenry
lurking with amused detachment
To: longshadow
ditto
To: Light Speed
I don't go hard on the man..he's a Genius.. I found Worlds in Collision very convincing ... when I was 16. The problem with the way Velikovsky's work is bandied about on these threads, his name often mentioned in reverential tones, is that V got it spectacularly wrong. Thought-provoking, yes. Entertaining, yes. Nevertheless, he made a thought-provoking, entertaining mess of it.
Whatever his IQ may have been, he was a dilettante, almost always working outside of any area of personal expertise. It's all wrong. That's worth mentioning, too.
To: longshadow; PatrickHenry
lunatics-on-the-loose placemarker
739 posted on 05/06/2003 10:50 AM PDT by longshadow [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies | Report Abuse
Thanks....
Looks like you guys just Lurk and mock people.
To: VadeRetro
"Guess there is allways a place for the one liner:...Did IQ's suddenly drop while I was away?
To: PatrickHenry
Cool article. Now, I have a question. What happens when Creationists read articles like this?
If you read an article like this and understand it, how can you not believe in evolution?
Abiogenesis is a completely different concept than evolution. I don't have a problem with rejecting abiogenesis -- as yet there is no scientific proof that life on earth evolved spontaneously from unliving matter -- maybe some living creatures hitched a ride on a meteorite, maybe God specially created life on earth when the conditions were right, who knows?
But to reject evolution seems totally nonsensical to me. The evidence is right there for anyone to see.
To: CobaltBlue
The evidence is right there for anyone to see. It is, isn't it? But some don't want to know.
47
posted on
05/06/2003 12:45:29 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: bert
That is Suveria jeepus Shouldn't the Permian version therefore be Suveriamimus jeepus? Over so long a time span, there can be no question of a direct relation.
48
posted on
05/06/2003 1:30:30 PM PDT
by
Grut
To: Grut
Ok all this scientific stuff confuses me...
so tell me if I buy the 97 Ford Explorer I have my eye on and factoring in this article and all the evidence so far in the global warming debate...
Will I contribute to global warming by driving it thus causing New York and L.A. to sink beneath the oceans?
And if the above is true then is this necessarily a "Bad" thing?
49
posted on
05/06/2003 1:42:13 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
To: Mad Dawgg
You didn't mention what happens to France. That's important to know.
To: Grut
The things you can learn on FRee Republic are endless.
51
posted on
05/06/2003 2:28:57 PM PDT
by
bert
(Don't Panic !)
To: Light Speed
52
posted on
05/06/2003 5:09:46 PM PDT
by
visualops
(You can't have any pudding if you don't eat your meat!)
To: CobaltBlue
as yet there is no scientific proof that life on earth evolved spontaneously from unliving matter...But which attitude is more likely to lead to productive research -- the belief that abiogensis cannot happen and there is no point in looking for evidence, or the belief that it probably happened at least once somewhere, somehow?
53
posted on
05/06/2003 5:19:07 PM PDT
by
js1138
To: visualops
Thanks for the photo..did a properties link to the site its from...cool.
Hope this link holds...
To: js1138
>>which attitude is more likely to lead to productive research<<
Looking, obviously. Even if (and I have no idea) originally life was NOT the result of abiogenesis, that doesn't mean that we can't replicate the results in a laboratory.
The villagers in Frankenstein might not agree . . . .
To: Light Speed
Ah I loved that movie, the dragons were awesome!
56
posted on
05/06/2003 7:30:09 PM PDT
by
visualops
(You can't have any pudding if you don't eat your meat!)
To: visualops
I liked it...kinda was hoping for more Technology vs Dragons...
Dragon Mythology is interesting...one area of the world especially..Central America
There's a Temple you may have seen...The Temple of Kulkulcan...with the Dragon heads at the base.
During the equinoxes..the suns shadow falls on the pyramid stairs ,the Dragons shadow appears to descend into the Earth...really cool.
To: CobaltBlue
Perhaps they are thinking....hogwash, for it to be valid science, you have to see it while it's happening. The same criticism would have to be leveled against astronomers and cosmologists studying events that occurred billions of years ago. Just a guess. I can't fathom the mindset.
58
posted on
05/07/2003 11:55:04 AM PDT
by
Ben Chad
59
posted on
08/20/2006 2:51:54 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson