To: mass55th
It would have been nice if the extent of deliberate damage done to the White House by those juvenile delinquents hadn't been smoothed over. That was pre-9/11. I agree with you that he has other priorities now, but...I beg your pardon for daring to have a thought other than terroristic threats against my nation....
25 posted on
05/05/2003 4:05:51 PM PDT by
ChemistCat
(My new bumper sticker: MY OTHER DRIVER IS A ROCKET SCIENTIST)
To: ChemistCat
History will deal with the Clintons and it won't be pretty. While I'd like to see them get theirs, I don't believe that it was Bush's responsibility to do this, especially not within the first year of his term of office. I remember how most of us were appalled when the first thing Clinton did after taking office was issuing his "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" rule. How would it have looked (especially after the recount fiasco & Supreme Court battle) for Bush to pursue the Clinton's shortly after he took office? I would hate to think how the press would have portrayed that. Part of the reason Bush is so popular is because he isn't like the Clintons...vindictive. People can see the difference between them. The Senate had the opportunity to convict Clinton and get rid of him. They failed to do their Constitutional duty. I think you have more of an argument with them than you do President Bush on this issue.
26 posted on
05/05/2003 4:23:20 PM PDT by
mass55th
To: ChemistCat
It's like he can't do two things at once...
29 posted on
05/05/2003 6:13:51 PM PDT by
sit-rep
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson