[Cacophonous]

I'll concede that he may not be meeting the strict definition of "hypocisy", as you seem to be willing to ignore a behavior that was not mentioned specifically as a vice by Bennett himself. I guess it depends, to paraphrase one of our lesser lights, what the definition of "moral" is.

So instead I'll stick with my usual beef with Bennett, his unbridled arrogance (I know, I know, arrogance is not a sin either).

Now please answer my questions. I'm curious as to what you think I have said in the past.

[borkrules]

And I will concede that you may not fall into either of the two camps I described. I have neither time nor inclination to parse through your past posts (although I'm sure they are all interesting).

Fair enough?