Skip to comments.
Booking Bennett
NRO ^
| 5/5/2003
| Jonah Goldberg
Posted on 05/05/2003 11:02:18 AM PDT by moneyrunner
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 341-342 next last
To: Nick Danger
RE: Your post #67.
Well said.
And spot on.
To: dfwgator
I agree the William Bennett has the right to gamble if he wants. But this is a guy who has made TONS of money from talking about virtue. Well, just as with the Dixie Chicks, you have a right to do as you please, but you are not immune from the consequences. Bennett's days of making money off of virtue are over.***DING DING DING*** No more calls; we have a winner.
142
posted on
05/05/2003 1:12:29 PM PDT
by
steve-b
To: William McKinley
Wonder how much the DNC and Terry McAuliffe spent when they had their big ole convention there? Remember all the drunk folks on the bus?
Think that was the last time they were there? Think it was the first time? Think they spent a ton?
We'll never know, because they don't have (R) after their names.
To: Mr. Bird; JohnGalt
I can't discuss "gambling" because I'm not a member of that community, and/or don't understand it. (Full disclosure- my gambling consists of: I played slots for fun, and craps for fun also, usually came out ahead). But I don't understand the "community rules." But thank you for asking a question I was about to. Where do these "undisputable" figures come from? 24 cents per dollar or 1-3 cents per? Not being sarcastic, merely curious for my own education's sake.
144
posted on
05/05/2003 1:13:31 PM PDT
by
cgk
(Liberal truisms are the useless children of hindsight.)
To: mabelkitty
145
posted on
05/05/2003 1:14:08 PM PDT
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: AbsoluteJustice
That actually WAS the original argument on another thread. Those to whom gambling is a morally reprehendible vice, maintain that people gamble away their houses, children's futures, income, security. Which we know many do. Bennett has done nothing of the sort as the story actually stated (paraphrasing) "Nothing of the sort could be confirmed."
146
posted on
05/05/2003 1:16:01 PM PDT
by
cgk
(Liberal truisms are the useless children of hindsight.)
To: William McKinley
"That's it, string him up. What a bastard!"
:)
147
posted on
05/05/2003 1:16:50 PM PDT
by
cgk
(Liberal truisms are the useless children of hindsight.)
To: JohnGalt
1-3 cents in profit per dollar gambled. That is different than what they take on the dollar before expenses No, you are absolutely wrong. Slots have a payout percentage ranging from around 92 to 99.7 percent. That means that for every dollar the machine takes in, it will eventually pay back 92 to 99.7 cents. There is no factoring in of expenses here. If you don't believe me, the casino will be happy to give this information, usually. Why? Because it's deceptive to the casual gambler, and they'll sit at a 99 percent machine all day long, thinking they'll only lose one percent of what they wager.
There is absolutely no method in existence in which you can accurately calculate winnings or losses on games of chance based strictly on the total amount wagered. Obviously, as the number of spins or hands approaches infinity, the calculations approach the "house advantage", but I don't think even Bennett played that long.
To: Cacophonous
Does she defend her fellow Democrats, and if so, on what grounds?
To: cgk
Mr.Bird is referring, I believe, to the profit per dollar gambled in Las Vegas that a casino owner would be looking to make. That is different than the take before expenses, which I am to understand is about 24 cents per dollar prior to expenses (comp drinks, attendents, taxes, free limos, meals, and rooms.)
150
posted on
05/05/2003 1:17:22 PM PDT
by
JohnGalt
(They're All Lying)
To: kjam22
But that isn't what he said, was it. Focus.
To: JohnGalt
St. Augustine overcame his problems. He wasn't perfect. His mother never gave up hope, that he would change. He became a great man.
To: cgk
I am basing my figures on my experiences in Vegas: advertised percentages. I cannot speak for Atlantic City, offshore, or riverboat casinos.
To: steve-b
***DING DING DING*** No more calls; we have a winner.
IMHO, this one was the winner...
Again, Bill B's attempt to surgically carve his personal favorite vice out of the category of "vices" is as unpersuasive as Bill C's attempt to surgically carve his personal favorite position out of the category of "sex".
154
posted on
05/05/2003 1:21:13 PM PDT
by
mr.pink
To: mabelkitty
I think you're the one who needs to focus. You justify Bennett's lecture tour based on Jesus' ministry??
155
posted on
05/05/2003 1:21:53 PM PDT
by
kjam22
To: kjam22; WarSlut
"He's just like the dixie chicks...."
Now THAT's out there. I don't recall Bennett apologizing, sort of, and then coming back and non-apologizing. I don't recall Bennett using the American Flag that he urinated on as a fig leaf for his own hypocrisy under "free speech". I don't recall Bennett ever stating that gambling was morally reprehensible. Please point me to the page in his Book of Virtues or some public statement he made where he does.
156
posted on
05/05/2003 1:22:01 PM PDT
by
cgk
(Liberal truisms are the useless children of hindsight.)
To: mabelkitty
Just point me to one moral person on the Left. Just one. Nat Hentoff. Next vacuous question?
157
posted on
05/05/2003 1:22:06 PM PDT
by
steve-b
To: Mr. Bird
http://off2vegas.com/gambling.html Video Poker plays down around 1-3%...this site reports slots are tilted 3%-25%...Keno comes in at the worst with the house keeping 30%.
158
posted on
05/05/2003 1:23:02 PM PDT
by
JohnGalt
(They're All Lying)
To: JohnGalt
You suggested his talking to people of questionable morals was unseemly, and I pointed out the truth to your silly statement.
Also, the real story is how the Nevada Gaming Commission is giving the theft of personal information a pass, and all you libs and leftist who HATE THE PATRIOT ACT, are totally ignoring this fact because you'd rather spit on him for created "morality" issues.
I, myself, am merely pointing out the hypocrisy of the accusers. Thanks for asking.
To: cgk
He's already tried to explain that he "broke even". Give him some time.... he'll do the Swaggart deal.
160
posted on
05/05/2003 1:23:36 PM PDT
by
kjam22
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 341-342 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson