Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate unseals McCarthy transcripts
Sac Bee ^ | 5/5/03 | Frederic J. Frommer - AP

Posted on 05/05/2003 9:26:21 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:50:46 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON (AP) - Pushing an anti-communist crusade that riveted America a half century ago, Joseph McCarthy manipulated his Senate hearings by calling witnesses he could intimidate and ignoring those likely to oppose him, newly released transcripts show.

Among the roughly 400 witnesses covered in transcripts of closed door meetings, made public Monday by the Senate, are composer Aaron Copland, New York Times journalist James Reston and Eslanda Goode Robeson, the wife of blacklisted singer-actor Paul Robeson. Some 4,000 pages of newly released documents also show that McCarthy was convinced that many writers, government officials and secretaries had access to classified information.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: anticommunists; bewaretheredmenace; cohn; commies; communism; communists; communistsubversion; crusade; fifthcolumn; fifthcolumnists; hearings; kgbfiles; lovedstalin; maccarthy; mccarthy; mccarthywasright; mediabias; prostalin; reddupes; redmenace; senate; socialists; stalinsusefulidiots; stillathreattoday; tailgunnerjoe; theredmenace; transcripts; unseals; usefulidiots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Should be interesting to cross reference this stuff with the Venona transcripts.
41 posted on 05/05/2003 11:49:07 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
After 50 years, Was McCarthy Right?
42 posted on 05/05/2003 11:49:33 AM PDT by weegee (NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
Yeah, but his tactics sucked.

If he'd questioned me like that I would have told him:
"Senator, it is not possible that I would have more contempt, than for person to abuse their position the way in which you are abusing yours."
43 posted on 05/05/2003 11:51:25 AM PDT by G Larry ($10K gifts to John Thune before he announces!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
I suspect that when this logo is unfurled:

...it really says this:


44 posted on 05/05/2003 11:52:11 AM PDT by weegee (NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; ikka
Would be handy to have this in a searchable format to compare with other documents. Some incredible information in these transcripts (I'm on #5, it is the smallest file).

William Morgan MD testified that his boss at the CIA, Horace S. Craig, told him "conclusions had been drawn that Senator McCarthy's influence was the most important factor in negating the influence of U.S. activities abroad".

Senator Potter. I would like to go back to where this man Craig stated that he felt that Senator McCarthy should be liquidated. I'd like to place the date of this. When did it happen?
Dr. Morgan. It happened in September.
Senator Potter. September of what year?
Dr. Morgan. Last year, 1953.
Senator Potter. He stated in essence that this man should be liquidated, referring to Senator McCarthy?
Dr. Morgan. It may be necessary.
Senator Potter. And that there are madmen----
Dr. Morgan. For a price willing to do the thing.

45 posted on 05/05/2003 12:23:48 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
"Yeah, but his tactics sucked. "

Stalin's tactics sucked.

yitbos

46 posted on 05/05/2003 12:24:17 PM PDT by bruinbirdman (Buy low, sell high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
from the John Birch Society -- The Real McCarthy Record
47 posted on 05/05/2003 12:40:38 PM PDT by slowry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
Joe McCarthy was right.

He may have been right in the abstract, but he went after popular figures and did so in a way that disgusted ordinary Americans. In so doing, he discredited honest conservatives, led to the election of Kennedy and Johnson, and probably Carter and Clinton.

The most underestimated American President of my lifetime was Eisenhower, who cooked this turkey in his own grease. Although I agree that communists had infiltrated the government, I cannot think of a single good thing that came out of the McCarthy hearings.

48 posted on 05/05/2003 12:56:19 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Apropos Robert Kennedy and Joe McCarthy: McCarthy was very popular in "flyover country" and Joe Kennedy took note of the fact, ingratiating himself and the family into Joe's inner circle. (E.g., KKT, the daughter of RFK who ran for governor of Maryland last year had McCarthy for her godfather!) Bobby got a job as Joe's co-counsel, working alongside Roy Cohn.

A rivalry soon simmered between those two and it got nasty. Joe fell for one of the Kennedy girls, I think the one that later married that twit-Brit actor. Joe McC. went to Joe K. and asked for her hand.

This created a huge dilemma for the scheming Kennedy: on the one hand, he'd have loved to have the intermarriage of the ambitious Kennedys with the wildly popular McCarthy; on the other, there was a religious problem: while both Joes were Catholic, McCarthy was divorced & remarried, a major no-no in those days that would have portended trouble among Catholics in the event of a run by a Kennedy nationwide.

In the end, Joe K. refused Joe McC. The latter didn't take it well, and eventually RFK was given the gate. Roy Cohn came smugly to the fore and the rest, as they say, is history. This is one of those facinating "what-if" situations.

P.S. -- to show you the incestuousness of Washington, know ye that Dick Morris is Roy Cohn's nephew!

49 posted on 05/05/2003 12:59:05 PM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
It is time for McCarthy to be rehabilitated. Because he was right. The commies were and are everywhere. Especially in the State Department and Hollywood.

Read here an excerpt from "Reagan's War -- The epic story of his 40-year struggle and final triumph over Communism"

50 posted on 05/05/2003 1:08:40 PM PDT by slowry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
When McCarthy asked whether he had ever been a communist sympathizer, Copland replied, "I am not sure I would be able to say what you mean by the word 'sympathizer.'"

Geee... I guess that also means I need to know what the meaning of "is" is.

Sheesh, it's good to know that the communism that is modern liberalism has ALWAYS been so completely vacuous.

:) ttt

51 posted on 05/05/2003 1:53:24 PM PDT by detsaoT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
he went after popular figures and did so in a way that disgusted ordinary Americans

Michael Moore is a popular figure. He is also a socialist.

Nothing protects the famous or powerful from being called on the carpet (there was a House Committee On Un-American Activities at the time, commonaly misidentified as HUAC, it had its origins in an investigating group established in 1938).

52 posted on 05/05/2003 2:16:17 PM PDT by weegee (NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: kegler4
"It might be stupid to be a communist or a socialist, but in the U.S. it's not illegal"

It is illegal for the communist party to be on a ballot for public office.

Note that they are all socialists, worker, progressive, green, or other euphemism parties.

yitbos

53 posted on 05/05/2003 2:35:41 PM PDT by bruinbirdman (Buy low, sell high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: js1138
"he went after popular figures and did so in a way that disgusted ordinary Americans. In so doing, he discredited honest conservatives, led to the election of Kennedy and Johnson, and probably Carter and Clinton."

Did Joe McCarthy himself lead to the election of liberals, or did the liberal/socialist establishment that counter-attacked and destroyed his reputation lead to the election of liberal Presidents? I always look at history in the context of its era. Communism had indeed infiltrated into the government, schools, business, (Armond Hammer), and even our churches, (read what Bella Dodd, a former Communist Party leader turned Catholic said about this). Communism in those days was spreading faster and more furious than AIDS and SARS combined. Suddenly a backwards peasant country like Russia had become a mighty Communist Empire, and China became Communist too. And Cuba became a surrogate Soviet State right off our coast. People were building underground nuclear bomb shelters, and public schools were sending chldren home with mimeographed evacuation plans for thermo-nuclear war. There were influential Communist parties in France and Italy, and some other Asian nations like North Korea had taken on Communist governments. Add to this the fact that even some traditionally conservative Catholic governments in South America were leaning towards socialism, and you get a much better picture of Joe McCarthy and his times. He became a convenient scapegoat becasue he was, in fact, a Roman Catholic. So hated were Catholics then, (and now), that a few years later a young, handsome, brilliant, charismatic Catholic named John Fitzgerald Kennedy, (also a war hero), had to publicly renounce his Catholicism to get elected. TWICE he was forced to publicly declare, (in W. Virginia and Texas), that he would "never allow my Catholic beliefs to get involved in public policy". Now, how many Protestant Presidential candidates felt compelled to make similar statements about their faith? NONE. Look how they have marginalized and ostracized poor Pat Buchanan, who has been right far more than he has been wrong. Joe McCarthy was right. Maybe his tactics were wrong, but HE was right.

54 posted on 05/05/2003 2:47:58 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Sigh, I too remember the days when Democrats weren't Communists. By today's standards, JFK would be a staunch conservative.
55 posted on 05/05/2003 2:50:21 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kegler4
McCarthy was partly right, but some people apparently think the innocent lives destroyed by his crusade were necessary collateral damage. That's crap.

Actually, it's crap that innocent lives were destroyed.

Q. Was it fair for McCarthy to make all those names public and ruin reputations?

A. That is precisely why McCarthy did not make the names public. Four times during McCarthy's February 20th speech, Senator Scott Lucas demanded that McCarthy make the 81 names public, but McCarthy refused to do so, responding that "if I were to give all the names involved, it might leave a wrong impression. If we should label one man a communist when he is not a communist, I think it would be too bad." What McCarthy did was to identify the individuals only by case numbers, not by their names.

By the way, it took McCarthy some six hours to make that February 20th speech because of harassment by hostile senators, four of whom - Scott Lucas, Brien McMahon, Garrett Withers, and Herbert Lehman - interrupted him a total of 123 times. It should also be noted that McCarthy was not indicting the entire State Department. He said that "the vast majority of the employees of the State Department are loyal" and that he was only after the ones who had demonstrated a loyalty to the Soviet Union or to the Communist Party.

Further, McCarthy admitted that "some of these individuals whose cases I am giving the Senate are no longer in the State Department. A sizable number of them are not. Some of them have transferred to other government work, work allied with the State Department. Others have been transferred to the United Nations."

The Real McCarthy Record
56 posted on 05/05/2003 3:03:59 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: detsaoT
Copland replied, "I am not sure I would be able to say what you mean by the word 'sympathizer.'"
Geee... I guess that also means I need to know what the meaning of "is" is.

A lot of that in these transcripts.Julius Reiss, an American employed by the Polish Delegation to the United Nations, is questioned by Roy Cohen:

Mr. Cohn. Have you served on the enlarged National Committee of the Communist party of the United States?
Mr. Reiss. I refuse to answer on the grounds previously stated. .
Mr. Cohn. Now, let me ask you this, Mr. Reiss: In your opinion, who was responsible--who was the aggressor in the Korean War?
Mr. Reiss. I refuse to answer on the grounds previously stated. .
Mr. Cohn. Do you believe in our form of government? Do you believe in a capitalistic democracy?
Mr. Reiss. I refuse to answer on the basis of the First and Fifth Amendments.
Mr. Cohn. Have you ever engaged in sabotage?
Mr. Reiss. What do you mean by sabotage?....

Volume 3 full transcript

57 posted on 05/05/2003 3:39:15 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: weegee
I pretty much stand by what I said. His tactics were counterproductive.
58 posted on 05/05/2003 4:22:15 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: js1138; backhoe; Tailgunner Joe; TheCrusader; NativeNewYorker; DPB101; weegee; slowry
I just caught the tail end of the C-SPAN presentation by Senators Collins and Levin and the associate Senate historian.

I'm not clear on their motives for the release of this information, other than the historian offered that it has been 50 years since the hearings were conducted.

Your comments about Senator McCarthy's behaviors are well-taken. But, regrettably, if not for him , no one else would have done a thing about what was an infiltration by communist influences into the government. To belittle that fact, in the end, gives those who support Big Red, the last laugh this time but not the final victory.

Also, by that time, Richard Nixon had moved on to the Vice Presidency after the successful prosecution of Alger Hiss.

I was also struck by the sh*t-eating grins on Senators Collins and Levin. To me , it looks like they did the grandstanding that senators are so prone to do in this new age of media.

The end game, again imho.. To legitimize and patronize and promote communism and the cause and show how "innocent" people were castigated in a supposed free nation respective of the rights of all to believe as they will. Sad, but not surprising, so thorough has the infiltration been into all of our institutions and the media. Coincidental, timing-wise, I think not, in light of C-SPAN and other media outlets fascination with groups like A.N.S.W.E.R. and the UN.

59 posted on 05/05/2003 7:27:50 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. Support FRee Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Been reading them since you posted this and I don't know what is more depressing: The massive infiltration and incredible arrogance of those who took the fifth, or the distortions I've seen in the media and from Levin and Collins today. One cannot comment on McCarthy without slogging through at least two volumes of the five released. We are lucky to have survived as a country and won the Cold War considering what was done and how easily most got away with doing it. There is a lot of good testimony from American Korean War POWs and from a Russian, Igor Bogolepov (volume #3), who was in the Red Army, hid out in Germany for two years after the war and then worked for Army Intelligence. When he testified before the Senate on communists in America, he was fired within a few days. His testimony has been sealed for 50 years because he begged McCarthy not to jeopardize the new job he had in government (CIA I assume). From volume two(Document from a Pittsburgh Communist Party USA meeting in 1952):

I. The present ``peace offensive'' is designed to be the last stage in the program of administering a ``sedative'' to the American people before the hammer of war falls on Continental United States. All functionaries have been alerted to concentrate on this present phase of the ``peace offensives'' for the purpose of building resistance to war and clamour for tax reduction so as to effect the defensive power of the Nation.

II. In line with the ``peace offensive,'' all trade union functionaries have been ordered to lay low, to make it appear that the class struggle has been sidetracked by the present Russian regime.

III. Actual ``operation propaganda'' is concentrating upon school, churches and children with principal reliance on front agencies, notably Civil Rights Congress.

IV. Senator McCarthy is among those listed for liquidation or murder--an American agent assigned to the job (L.B.).

V. The pending communist cases against known communist functionaries have been ordered dragged out for the purpose of diverting the attention of the American people to the `down in the mouth defendants' to make it appear that the communists apparatus U.S.A. is bankrupt, defunct and on its way to the prison, when actually, there has never been more money or more activity in the communist apparatus in the past eleven years.

60 posted on 05/05/2003 8:26:07 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson