Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
Bump. Be back later.
6 posted on 05/04/2003 5:06:55 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Or most risky of all, they could follow the path of Lyndon Johnson, who despite favoring civil rights personally had to oppose it publicly until the mid-1950s.

LBJ didn't give a rat's patootie about civil rights until it was made absolutely clear to him that he would never be President without it. So he allowed a watered down, worthless piece of legislation to pass that accomplished exactly nothing. It was all smoke and mirrors.

53 posted on 05/04/2003 8:24:30 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson