Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WaterDragon
Although the article is strongly tinged with anti-Americanism, I would not call it drivel. It may well be that the doctrine of force protection may have had a rigid effect on the American troops responses to Iraqi behavior in the immediate post war period. Gaining the trust of the civilian population of a beaten country is always a tricky business. It may be that the seemingly minor decision of the Brits to take off their helmets, and wear berets (to give just one example), has paid big dividends in gaining the trust of the locals in Basra. Maybe the doctrine of force protection needs some modification. Sometimes something can be learned by the US military from another military organization.
40 posted on 05/04/2003 3:41:52 PM PDT by ricpic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ricpic
The Brits wore berets during all those years in Northern Ireland. I don't remember that it pacified anyone. And Ronald Merrick, the protaganist of "The Jewel and the Crown" wore culottes but it didn't stop him from treating the natives like dirt! Soon the British papers will suggest we send over Harvey Fierstein in a smock to control the Iragis.
434 posted on 05/05/2003 1:05:28 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson