Is This Election Cycle To Be Politics As Usual?

It was the week of May 2nd, 2003, and what was the ‘outrage of the week’? … Bill Bennett’s gambling habits. Why was that selected by the Democrat Party operatives in the presstitute corps? … Because it served an agenda and methodology of the Democrat Party. Well, you say, then what’s the big deal since it’s just politics as usual and the elections are fast approaching? … At this unique time in our nation’s history, the methodology in question is particularly dangerous.

First point, the Democrat methodology is divisive politics through media assisted ‘stories’ designed to pander to a particular constituency of the specious ‘big-tent’ Democrats. To accomplish this division among the people (or perhaps emphasize what is only a crack), the Democrats play at class warfare, class envy, mistrust, and outright hate on occasion. They’ve been doing it better than the Republicans for decades, but the technique rose to new heights with the Clinton years.

Second, an historically old tactic called ‘the politics of personal destruction’ surfaced during the Clinton years, with a vengeance. Character assassination focused on Clinton, his co-president, Hillary, minor players such as the White House Travel office personnel Hillary wanted replaced, two Speakers of the House, a powerful conservative Republican Committee Chairperson, and assorted other Republicans upon whom the Clinton White House could sic their stealthy friend and digger for sleaze, Larry Flynt. Sid Blumenthal, working out of an appointment office at the White House, even stooped so low as to go after Christopher Hitchens when he wouldn’t publish a lie the White House wanted to use for leverage against poor naïve Monica! That was then, the last of the last century, this is now, the first of the next century.

In successive weeks, the American public has been assaulted with such earthshaking non-outrages as the Republican Presidential candidate had a DUI decades ago and didn’t bother to air that outrage; Trent Lott’s misspeak at Strom Thurmond’s birthday party; healthy debate between the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense (the current President actually meets with his cabinet several times per week, unlike the previous White House occupant who met with his cabinet but few times per year). We were treated to Senator Rick Santorum’s comments regarding a Texas sodomy law working its way to the Supreme Court, for review. Buoyed onward and upward with the trickery employed by a close relative of Democrat hopeful, John Kerry’s top aid, the Santorum story appeared at first to have traction as the servile media tried to pump the non-story into a major outrage between conservative values (mostly held by the Republican Party, but also held by the religious moderates within the Democrat Party, and we’ll get to that very important point in a minute) and so called homosexual rights. But with the fabricated outrage regarding Bill Bennett’s gambling habits, we detect a new and very dangerous escalation to the class warfare Democrat methodology.

When the hit people serving the Democrat Party ‘walking points’ aimed their character assassination projectile at Bill Bennett¾also seeking collateral damage to Justices Scalia and Rhenquist by craftily inserting a reference to these conservatives gambling with Bennett in another gaming venue¾they were actually shooting at rank and file, mostly Democrat voters. What this new strategy amounts to is an escalation in class envy and distrust, and even blind partisanship that was slipping from Democrat’s reliability tables. By making a big deal out of the amount of money Bennett is purported to have lost, the Democrats hoped to focus middle and lower income wage earners on the ‘wasteful nature of Bennett’s addiction’, the implied disdain of Bennett toward the commoners … precisely at the time Republicans are also being characterized by the Democrats (with great media assistance and joyful pandering) as pushing ‘tax cuts for the wealthy that show disdain for the needs of the little guy’.

September 11th, 2001, everything changed in America. To be sure, the changes didn’t all surface immediately. But that horrific event heralded a paradigm shift in the American psyche, drawing people together in a way not seen since WW II … and a Republican administration stood to gain most by dealing with the new world in an adult fashion hallmarked by a no nonsense application of military might and international cooperation in tracking down terrorist, dealing forcefully with the states that sponsor and protect terrorists and their training and implementation bases.

For the 2002 Congressional election cycle, the Democrat Party tried to take the nation’s focus off of the war against an enemy determined to destroy our way of life and the lives of perhaps hundreds of thousands of our fellow citizens. It didn’t work. The average, reliably Democrat voters, taken for granted for so long, didn’t take their attention off of the threats, and remained somewhat united with fellow average Republican Americans. The common bond of moderate conservatism held fellow Americans together in their resolve to fight the terrorists for our survival. Our unity transcended party politics, and the Democrats lost more of their power in an unprecedented mid-term election. But they have resorted to obstructionism, panicked that their liberalism might slip from power even in the courts. With the 2004 elections approaching, what were the Democrats to do? … They returned to their overused methodology of divide the people and sweep up the constituencies. Were it not for 9/11/2001, it would be politics as usual, obscene, but we could live with it for a season.

The war against terrorism is a unique problem in the history of America, not so much because of the lives lost, but because to continue waging the war on a global scale, the people must steel their resolve until the threat is no more. To steel their resolve they must remain, to the greatest extent possible, united! Democrat’s methodology is directed at accomplishing just the opposite. The manipulation to envy of the wealthy and distrust for conservatives, wealthy conservatives, wealthy conservative REPUBLICANS, is designed to divide the people along class lines, inviting blind opposition in the voting booth that will destroy the unity of the people and kill their resolve to stand shoulder to shoulder in the war against terrorists.

If the reader thinks this screed is absurd, look carefully at how prominent Democrats are changing their opposition to the war against Saddam’s regime, repositioning themselves in order to imply they would do just as this president has done, making America just as secure under their leadership … and it is an absolutely false characterization, as eight years of Clintonian appeasement to dictators and postponement of meaningful action have so adequately proven. If the Democrat operatives succeed with this campaign of character assassination and divisiveness, the ultimate victim will be the Republic, because a people divided cannot stand in opposition to evil, domestically or abroad.

I have only one last pair of notions. What the Democrat media servants are ignoring, regarding conservative Mister Bennett, is: his spending of his own earned money, in union shop casinos, is helping to support jobs for the very middle and lower income people the goons of character assassination are trying to manipulate into distrusting, envying, and hating the Bill Bennett’s of America! I would bet some of my money that if asked, these employees appreciate Mister Bennett’s chosen spending habits, and wouldn’t advise him to buy an extra house along the Atlantic Coast (many Democrat presidential hopefuls have them), or a bigger yacht (several extremely rich Democrat politicians own them), or … well, you get the gist. And finally, what Bill Bennett does with his earned money does impact his future credibility as an advisor regarding virtue, but his failing (and let’s be honest, it is a failing) is only important to politics if the Democrats can manipulate the people into envy, distrust, and pulling the D lever because of divisive partisanship.

Is this season of character assassinations really politics as usual, given the paradigm shift in America’s war against a deadly enemy that isn’t going away and must be killed and incarcerated under the steady resolve of a united people? Hold on to your seats, folks, because the Democrat operatives are already triangulating their assassination attempts … Juan Williams, speaking on Fox News Sunday, asserted that Bennett’s gambling was a non-issue. Of course, the same triangulation tactic was used while the Clinton White House sicced Flynt on prominent Republicans, seeking any dirt that could be splayed before the public, to assassinate Clinton’s detractors and accusers, and by implication render his degeneracy ‘unimportant because everybody does it’. The cited episodes are but the beginning of a divisive, manipulative, and very dangerous campaign to gain back power over this nation. It will get a whole lot nastier before election day, and Democrat success will make this nation more vulnerable, exponentially.

The venom of democrat bitterness is dripping from too many gaping maws for this old boy to ignore it, the pile of bones collecting beside the DNC hit people is growing too large to step around it.

You are correct.

The next step is how should it be dealt with? Let's look first at how the Democrats deal with it. They are very consistent, no matter whom among them is attacked. They "deny, distract, and destroy." Is that strategy effective? In the short term, yes. But in the long term, those who defend, excuse and justify immoral behavior among their ranks eventually begin to be viewed as immoral themselves and lose credibility to speak to any moral issue with credibility.

This is not an option for us. We are not going to allow our party loyalty to knock our moral compass out of line (I hope). The challenge is to stay consistent while treating some situations differently than others. When do we defend those in our party who are unfairly attacked (Lott, Santorum, e.g.) and when do we acknowledge that the attack is fair and agree with the message, despite who delivered it?

A much wiser person than me would have the answer to that.

But I do think it's not wise to discount factual information about a leader in our party just because the information was contained in a "hit" piece. We also shouldn't buckle under like we did with Lott until we get the full picture and hear from the accused.

This is difficult stuff. Thank you for undertaking to shed some light on it.

Clearly, what Bill Bennett was hooked on is a failing. That is not something I argue with, and apparently Bill also agrees beacuse he has publicly vowed to stop gambling. The effect intended by the DNC will not, however, go away with Bill's public 'apology'. Until we the people repudiate these bastards using such factual exposures as a means to divide and destroy the will of the people, this sort of democrat destruction will rage on. My response? ... VOTE THE BASTARDS OUT ... kepp adults in charge while we are under attack.

Thank you for this... written very well.

Your posting about the strength of the military, not only against terrorism, but also as voters for Bush caught my attention.

I am not really familiar with NY politics, but I have been wondering if Hillary has been doing enough to pacify the New Yorkers who were ravaged on 9-11, and vow never to forget. I am aware that NY is a heavy Democratic state. However, wouldn't 9-11 have caused another psychological shift among the voters? Or, has Hillary stood shoulder-to-shoulder with the President, just ENOUGH to satisfy the voters... drumming up support for relief dollars, emphasizing homeland security, calling for a bigger police force to combat future terrorism, etc?

You are more than correct in stating this is politics as usual, especially using the class-warfare and personal destruction angle.

As I have stated before, this Democratic mindset is so difficult for me to accept, especially because I truly believe that the world completely changed on September 11th, and I had hoped that the average American would have woken up to the dangers of the world. My fear is that they will naively think of the "good-ole" days under Clinton, and never realize that Clinton had passed the buck, and refused to face the growing evil against America. He is party to the terror in America. And, his wife will eagerly want to turn the page, put 2001 behind us, and spend her way into re-election, should she win in 2004.

his spending of his own earned money, in union shop casinos, is helping to support jobs for the very middle and lower income people the goons of character assassination are trying to manipulate into distrusting, envying, and hating the Bill Bennett’s of America!

Good point. Casinos value their high rollers very much. They call them "whales". You can bet that the casinos will launch a full investigation as to who leaked the documents. One thing is for sure, the casino employees(unionized) will miss him. I "bet" the cocktail waitresses are very upset. I'll "bet" he was a big tipper.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.