Posted on 05/03/2003 12:36:49 PM PDT by mukraker
Restriction of development is not necessary. Government's role with regard to water can simply be limited to setting the rates required for consumption of said water. Then people's actions will adjust accordingly, same as with any other resource.
When one are becomes heavily populated, the traffic impacts are felt in a much larger radius, in other communities.
That's not a reason to restrict development or population of a certain area. It may be a reason to restrict motor traffic itself, but not property rights.
Also roads and highway management, planning and design are not done effectively on a local level.
That's a completely separate matter from private property rights - except, of course, when it involves issues of eminent domain, but that's another subject.
Exerpts:
Lakes Louise and Carol were also added and Beaver Creek was developed into the excellent trout stream it is today.
By the end of 1987, the Woodlands Golf Academy was established and within another year the Woodlands Spa opened. Soon afterward, the Gazebo, Lake PJ and the Panorama Pavilion were constructed. Fallingbrook miniature golf course, located next to the Caddy Shack, opened in July 1992. Putting under waterfalls and rock formations proved to be an enjoyable and challenging past time for guests.
In May 1995, Nemacolin opened its $2 million Paradise Pool, adjacent to the Woodlands Spa. The larger-than-Olympic-style pool was built to resemble pools from the Riviera and Hawaii. Its distinctive design elements include intricate tile and ceramic border, a swim up bar and a whirlpool for twelve. Food and beverage service can be enjoyed on the sun deck.
To ensure the resort's place as a year-round destination, Mystic Mountain, a downhill ski area, opened December 1995. Five slopes tied together by eight trails provide some twenty five acres of ski terrain.
Add 125 luxury rooms, townhouses, and private homes, and there is water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
ANY time you hear *sustainable growth*, it's socialist at its core. Fight now or lose private property and property rights forever.
McGinty is demonic, Kay. Keep up the good fight. You know how it goes around here. And there is always another scheme right around the bend.
LOL! I'll have to keep that terminology in mind...
In my experience, the development that ends up having the most negative impact on the neighbors is the one that government planners had the biggest hand in. Too often I'm seeing developers and planners working together for their mutual interests. The planning staff doesn't appear to be under any obligation to consider the rights of individuals, but they are obligated to watch for opportunities for "free" money from the Fed or State government. So if a developer tells them that they can do things that would make local government eligible for grants, that ends up driving the decision-making and commonsense goes out the window!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.