[Varmint Al]

I have heard that the ammo you already have on hand will be subject to the "use" fee. This is some kind of ex-post-facto concern, but the state of CA is completely run by DemocRats. They believe they are above the law and, as liberals do when in control, know what is best for the masses.

And with the Ninth Circuit Xourt in SF, what chance is there to challenge any law the Rats come up with?

Good Hunting... from Varmint Al

[Carry_Okie]

I have heard that the ammo you already have on hand will be subject to the "use" fee.

Needless to say that also means that they will also then have to keep track of who paid the fee and who didn't; what would effectively be ammo registration.

For those Republican idiots who walked out on Bill Simon, thinking it was better to let the Slave Party take the State into the tank, consider this.

[golder]

I have heard that the ammo you already have on hand will be subject to the "use" fee.

How would they enforce that? How much tax is presently generated by ammo? I say, pass the dime tax. How hard is it to purchase ammo from alternate sources? My point, same as tobacco, the state will ultimately loose revenue. A small price to pay, to watch the collapse of this state government. Watching government twist in the wind over disappearing revenue is becoming a wonderful spectator sport.