Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
And secondly, it refers to someone who generally advocates a policy of intervention in the affairs of other countries. There may, even by his own stated understanding, be little if any suggestion that the countries in question are in any serious position to attack us imminently.

This may depend on what exactly "imminently" means, but it seems to me that by this definition, many if not most (conservative) advocates of war against Iraq are "neocons". Including myself.

Thanks for the clarification.

295 posted on 05/07/2003 10:30:08 PM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Frank
it seems to me that by this definition, many if not most (conservative) advocates of war against Iraq are "neocons".

I wouldn't think so. If they were in favor of the war on the grounds of Iraq's dispostion towards us, then they wouldn't qualify as neocons. It's only when they base their desire to go to war on its government's disposition towards its own society (or even surrounding societies, but not us). That's what "interventionism" means.

296 posted on 05/08/2003 7:09:59 AM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson