Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T'wit
T'wit wrote: (>> they started calling themselves paleo-conservatives) Who?? That's my problem. Name some who do. The ones Frum named do not.

Oh for cripes sake!

Go to the Chronicles Web site, they bill themself as the flagship magazine of paleo-conservatism.

184 posted on 05/03/2003 9:41:14 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: quidnunc
> Go to the Chronicles Web site, they bill themself as the flagship magazine of paleo-conservatism.

I've visited in person and have known the people invoved for decades. The Rockford Institute is old-line conservative, albeit with a particular interest in "social" conservatism. This is the definition of paleo-con that I used (i.e., those who were the conservative movement before the neo-cons arrived) -- not the pejorative definition used by David Frum. They have little in common with self-designated libertarians Lew Rockwell, Joe Sobran, Justin Raimondo, et al., none of whom would dream of calling himself a conservative of any stripe. Frum had an ax to grind.

Rockford, as I recall, was a spinoff from Rockford College, led by John Howard, president emeritus of the Institute as well as the college. Allan Carlson is based at Rockford -- great conservative scholar in social questions. These are old line conservatives, not these allegedly horrid paleos. Tom Fleming -- well, he's feisty, but on the whole he's been a good asset over the years. (And beware -- there's another Tom Fleming in the public policy world, an historian.)

203 posted on 05/04/2003 9:19:32 AM PDT by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson